Sheb from everything I can gather... it seems to be equally psychologically damaging on men... (Ohh dear goodness)
It just seems like men are less likely to call foul from the attempt.
The person in that article might have been being "raped" but in his case it was more that he was struggling as to whether or not he wanted it. Rather then being adamantly against it. It is why he doesn't seem to be as bothered by it.
The Gender swapped version he created in his head doesn't place the woman in his shoes, he didn't imagine a woman having struggling thoughts as to whether or not she really wants to have sex with this guy and if she would be taking advantage of him. (UGH 50 shades flashbacks AHH!)
Does it matter? No... Rape is rape... But it is interesting that the implied gender switch automatically assumes she doesn't want it outright with none of the other context.
No no no.
It assumes that all men have male privileged. Which is to say that they enjoy the advantages of that one element over women. The overall influence of that one axis of privilege are referred to as sexism.
It assumes nothing beyond that
You need to read closer and see how it uses terms like "men" and "women". It uses them as cohesive singular units of single mindedness.
If you just apply that "men are not all men" and "women are not all women" then the entire argument collapses because everyone doesn't have the same experiences.
As well it implies that Sexism is "overall".
Better yet, just think of it this way. How can a man be sexist towards a woman under the same conditions when you really think about it? If sexism is ONLY "overall" then individual acts of sexism isn't sexism.
If it makes it easier for you, replace 'sexism' with 'systematic sexism' or 'cultural sexism' in any feminist work. And the same for racism in...
No, that is eliminating the point it is trying to make and the entire basis for which I passionately reject its entire notion. As well...
YES men can be systematically discriminated against. In all ways? No.
So I can STILL reject it passionately on the notion that saying that men cannot be systematically or culturally discriminated against on the basis that they have a leg up is still something I'd openly reject.
It is still an example of the extremist sexism that people confuse as feminism as a whole. I don't even believe most feminists believe in it.
Most people, I like to believe, know that you can be sexist against men and racist against white people. The question they have though is what constitutes it (For example a off collar joke about men, isn't likely going to hurt a man. So it isn't sexist).