Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Current one, unchanged.

+4 AS and +5 DMG when moving 4 spaces or more.

+2 AS and +3 DMG on Player Phase, with additional +2 AS and +2 DMG when moving 4 spaces or more.

+1 AS and +1.5 DMG for each space moved up to 4 spaces.

Current one but AS bonus is converted to DR from the end of the Player Phase until the next one.

I don't know but I want to see the results.

[Xanmyral]

Xan, what do you think of Fencers trumping whatever subcategories they're using at the time?

Sorry for the late reply, had to do a presentation.

Anyway, I think its fine in that its small enough that I consider it a nice addition instead of a replacement, which keeps with the fencer sneaking thing (which I like myself, not because its the fencers who have it but because I like the effects that it has (maybe if we really want to change the fencer's abilities, shunt those to the thief tree where it would fit. Maybe thieves or scavengers, although thieves strike me as more of the type to skulk and spies already have those fancy trap changes you gave them)).

[Blade Master Model 42]

Both options are yes.

And if we give them a new special, no more pillar dodging. They can keep reduced move costs for pillars though.

[Xanmyral]

If it gets chosen to change their special, can we at least give the sneaking to someone else? I like the sneaking.

[Solymr]

Both options are yes.

And if we give them a new special, no more pillar dodging. They can keep reduced move costs for pillars though.

WHOOPS SLIPPED

[Shoruke]

If it gets chosen to change their special, can we at least give the sneaking to someone else? I like the sneaking.

We should add the Sneaking to Shadow Swords, so that they can still use their cool class feature.

[SeriousConcentrate]

Makes sense to me.

[Rolepgeek]

how many enemies get thrusting weapons?
Maybe when using the same weapon type. You know. Fencing is sword v sword.

I like this idea. Fencing swords were invented for the explicit purpose of trumping other sword-users in a swordfight, after all.

On the other hand, this would mean that Fencers have advantage against 2/3rds of the weapon triangle at all times. Should we make it only apply when using their best weapon category, or maybe only when using thrusting swords?

As a note, sword users kinda have that anyway since there's Swordbreaker and shit.

[Rolepgeek]

What about Crusader's class feature?

EDIT: Gah doublepost damnit

[Powder Miner]

Hmm. The Armoured idea there might be rather balanced.

[Solymr]

/slowpoke

I don't like Sneaking too much because 1) teleporting shenanigans 2) forces GM to adapt map to fencer.

[Blade Master Model 42]

/slowpoke

I don't like Sneaking too much because 1) teleporting shenanigans 2) forces GM to adapt map to fencer.

Just only allow them to sneak between pillars they could path to normally.

[Solymr]

Well now they don't because they won't have sneaking again
What was the bonus of Challenge again?

[Blade Master Model 42]

I forgot.

10 hit and evade as well as the enemy draw thing?

[Solymr]

Ok
I'll put that and the triangle advantage version to see which one is better. Same for the dueling one.
Also for dueling: it's going to be bonus if chosen weapon vs same weapon type.

[Solymr]

Poll updooted.
Did I do it right this time? :V