I guess it should have been more immediately obvious, but Max's plan must have been to get Persus mislynched in order to have the hunter target him at night. As he was a knight, the attack wouldn't have worked. Perhaps they were afraid of town lynching scum during the day and the hunter getting the final scum at night.
TiruinI've to note that, even in your analysis, Your analysis is a generality--considering that it includes the prospect of Max//Caz to be scum, instead of directly judging them SPECIFICALLY. ie FoS'ing suspects.
I believe the same analysis, on observation, includes me as 'scummy' instead--or are you trying to twist something there? Because that's what I'm feeling on how the direct hop is going.
This is a new kind of scumhunting. I'm saying the meta-data (voting patterns, post counts etc.) correctly showed Max and Caz to be the scummiest players and so I have good reason for suspecting you too as you're the next scummiest by this metric.
You didn't read my posts, did you?
Reasons and case-basis on me, NQT. I'd love to read them.
Of course I read your posts. But I put more faith in people's actions than what they say. If, after completing my next round of analysis, I still find you guilty I'll present further reasons for that being the case. For now, I'm trusting the voting patterns.
Calling it a lie then making it part of a logical reasoning--when said reasoning is discarded as you said yourself--seems like a big deal here.
Not really. I often change my mind when new information comes to light or when I gain a fresh perspective on old information.
*might*?
Ello, there is 1 scum and 4 town. Mislynch 1, 3 town. NK 1, 2 town. With a Persus being there as honorable proof.
I was assuming the hunter was going to kill another townplayer in the night, but apparently Toaster has decided to show restraint.
NQT..how or why does your analysis reflect differently from...the lynch vote count here?
Have you not being paying any attention whatsoever?! I count the number of separate individuals a person has voted for during the day, not just who they happened to be voting at the end of the day. In fact, I track everyone's vote and their reasons for the vote in a spreadsheet.
I know that one of the scum must have bussed Max
@bolded part: 'Know'?
..Wait, erk. It was interesting though, how that was worded (..you're the only other voting for Persus) but..bleh. Anyway.
What's with how you format that list anyway? Toony is in a separate box. You are in a separate box.
The only people not voting Max were a now-confirmed townie and myself, so of course I know scum bussed Max! The numbers next to people's names in my analysis are the number of people those players have actively suspected in the day. Of the five players left alive, you've actively suspected the least number of players. Keeping a low-profile is the greatest scum-tell.
Logic dictates that you leave a vote on me without sustainable evidence, then? Or are you just signalling what 'the vote analysis' leaves?
Basically, I'm signalling that you are the number one suspect but I might change my mind if further investigation shows this to be untenable.
Also that means you saw him breathing..which means he was alive due to respiratory function. Which generally leads to the everything-else-function like circulation . . .Bleh. Putting it aside but..it strikes me as weird how that happened (most @Meph but 
I've got Priest notes on the before-time)
..Though I haven't read anything on 'visually seeing him [RESPIRE]' anywhoo.
I saw proof that he was definitely alive. I'd be a pretty rubbish resurrection if I'd just left him there without seeing if he was really alive.
"Track record"? And "Kill another Town"?
Clarify.
'Track record' is an
idiom basically meaning 'collective accomplishments and failings'. I was saying that Toaster has consistently targeted town players to kill in the night and so I have little faith that he'd successfully pick scum on the last night.
PersusImp- I'm pretty sure Imp's town. If Imp hadn't roleclaimed, I would have been the one to swing yesterday, as 3 players voted me, one said he would have if Imp hadn't claimed, and scum Imp would have voted me as well, which would have been enough to hang me.
This makes a lot of sense but I'm going to go over Day 3 again to double-check how things went down.
Tiruin- She is the second most scummy at the moment, as Illusionist seems like an easy role to fake-claim right now. However, she tunneled Caz fairly strongly for two days straight and helped to lynch him. Other a single vote on Cmega, she's voted confirmed scum. So she seems town.
Yeah this how I thought at first. But then... tunnelling your team mates (as unproductive as it looks) is definitely a way to avoid general suspicion as you look active and productive withotu risking drawing the unwanted attention of genuine town. I'm going to be looking into it today.
NQT-NQT has seemed scummy to me, mainly for the "no rational reason why Max could fake-claim" business. Max had the opportunity to get away with it, especially as he didn't have to fear the Monster Hunter. He accuses me of voting him for voting me, and he would be exactly right. NQT did everything he could to try and get me or Imp lynched instead of Max lynched, and if he had convinced more than Toonyman, he would have succeeded. I highly doubt that at this stage of the game someone would do an elaborate bus of Max when his lynch of me would have succeeded if it hadn't been for Imp. In addition, the fact that his primary means of voting someone has consistently shown him on top and thus, ultra-town is also suspicious. Another thing that seems suspicious to me is the flavor of NQT's resurrection. The Temple of Death seems something different and separate then normal resurrections, which usually happen in a graveyard. NQT prays to the gods. This gives me a very pagan feel to it. He also said he prayed to the gods. I may be assuming something here (I'm a Christian), but I assumed the priests in this were monotheistic. Finally there's NQT's interactions with scum. D1 he and Max have a huge battle, that then turns into them and Caz ganging up on Nerjin when he took NQT's side. D2 he voted Caz, then switched to Jim. D3 he voted Max, then switched to me. That seems like a guy trying to appear town by voting scum, but avoiding actually following through.
So at the time I couldn't fathom why a rational Max would fakeclaim seer. Now I know he was a knight and was hoping to draw the attention of the hunter, I can kind of see why he did it. But at the time!
I don't see why a setting with good witches and sorcerers would necessarily have a monotheistic religion. In previous Supernatural games there were town priests that prayed to multiple gods (in
Supernatural 2, for instance).
I obviously didn't appear town by voting scum and switching my vote off for other reasons if now you think it makes me look like scum. Willingness to change one's mind when evidence suggests things to be otherwise is a town trait. Was Toony scum just because he voted you?
ToasterVerdict: I need to go over all of NQT and Tiruin's posts again. I still doubt it's Imp or Persus.
Whoever is scum, scum have voted scum in this game. Tiruin on Caz, Imp on Max, Max on me and Persus etc. We've got to work out which bus was most likely.
Okay, in my next post expect an examination of the lynching cases.
Author
Topic: Supernatural Mafia 6 - Game Over! (Read 170359 times)