Tiruin, you yap at Caz for not following your case.
I can't follow it either.
I sort of get that it's because he said you hopped targets when you really hadn't. Is that the gist of it?
But he unvoted you. He explained his reasons and acted on it. Where are you going with this now?
Is this an objection to this particular line or my case in general? I shall answer both, since I don't think we have the time to clarify
If it's to my case in general: He cast a vote for weak reasons, and then withdrew it. The latter does not excuse the former. Do you think he would have backed off if I hadn't voted him? He says he likes to base cases on genuine reads n' shit but voting for me because I disagree with him about how a
vigilante should operate seems to contradict that.
If it's to the particular line: Yes, he did. This was more an explanation of why I thought he was wrong.
This obviously wasn't an admission, and why do you list voting Cmega to tie the vote when he clearly unvoted before day's end in the section you quoted?
Look at it in the context of Toaster's post immediately above it. Toaster blasts him as scum. Nerjin's response is to unvote and say "Yep."
I dispute that it obviously wasn't an admission.
He also made a case against Cmega3 that incidentally also tied the vote. If a person were suspicious of Nerjin and of what he might do at the end of the day, they might see an alternative motive besides thinking Cmega3 was scum.
Riiiight, but I'm not voting you am I?
That doesn't make it all better or magically make me go away.
The only thing that can do that is video games and 504 errors!
HAAAAAAAR HAR HAR har.I then thought to take some time to reflect on the game and so unvoted, and now I'm of the opinion that he may or may not be scum but he's certainly a loose cannon with some questionable ideas about how to play effectively (which is not something to vote someone for as it's independent of his alignment).
How come you didn't recognize this when you cast your vote?
Also, you never answered this question from Toaster. I only ask because I'm interested in the same information.
NQT: What do you hope to gain from your "kill versus inspect" questioning? Same for the "res y/n?"
In general, I'd like to see where you are going next.
I can get asking other people for their opinions. What I don't get is the tabulation of their responses either in favor of or against. The only reason you would do that is if you were trying to prove something. I can only assume it was about your case on me, because what else could it have been about.
Max and Caz did well on the questioning test but have only pressed one lynch case on one person in the entire game. This clear lack of genuine suspicion and reluctance to draw negative attention is not a town trait.
This is, like, so dumb. It emphasizes quantity over quality.
I make no statement of the quality of their cases, but I point out that yesterday you believed Max White was town for pushing his single case. Now you FoS him.
What gives, brometheus?
No posts today besdies Tiruin? wow.
Hi Caz, Tiruin's post convinced me you're scum.
This is a bandwagon vote.
That you quickly reversed.
But still a bandwagon.
Everyone (and especially Jim, who I know won't answer unless asked directly) I see something odd about Persus13's recounting of his attack. It's a detail that makes me believe it happened, because it's downright weird - and I'd like to get people's opinions on that weirdness and what it might mean.
He says that his attacker was described as having great instincts.
I don't see this as particularly weird.
Persus13 clarifies:
To clarify on my attack. I hid in a corner, the guy broke into the room, I attacked before he spotted me, but it said he had good instincts and blocked. Then we fought for a while.
If somebody knows that something is wrong enough to block an attack he otherwise doesn't know is coming, I'd describe that as good instincts.
The Scumteam leader has always not had an ordinary role (ex. Werewolf Leader, Cult Leader, Vampire Lord). S4 also had a Vampire Slave who was vanilla scum. However S3 started with a Vampire Warlock. Anyway, NQT couldn't be a Vampire Lord.
Argh, dammit. This is true. If Vampires are our scum team then finding the Vampire Lord is top priority.
For lack of a better target I'm going to continue voting notquitethere, until as such time the existence of a Vampire scumteam is more or less proven, or a more likely target appears, whichever comes first.
This also rules out Persus13.
sigh I'm just SOL on all my targets.
Anyways, if the scumteam really is Vampires, then the most effective strategy to find him is to role confirm as many people as not Vampire Lords as possible, and then work within this narrowed-down list.