I can't even follow your arguments at this point. GG you glorious mentalist.
Primitive defensive mechanism detected: Denial (Subversive).
Thanks for sealing in my doubts. Instead of asking to restate or inquire on what exact portion is confusing you, you fall back on one of the less obvious, yet still apparent, methods of denial. I am open for all queries regarding my accusations of you, and all I get is a backhand and a discarding handwave.
If I am spewing confusing material, do you not think it is scummy? If so, why do I see no mention of it at all? Or is guilt one of the primary reasons behind your acts towards me?
Because coming from all others--my case looks concise, in the least. Readable, and understandable.
LET ME LINK IT AGAIN before I get insulted.
THIS is my accusatory post which you so craftily weaved through and picked on, only the superficial details did you manage to answer. All else has been discarded under the diaphanous guise
This is the classic lurkertracker. The one which isn't regularly used because its in the second page of the Mafia board. The old ancestor of ZU's lurkertracker which sits grumpily in the back because nobody bothers to talk with him anymore and is actually a bit sad inside.
And now let me serve you key lime pie. Made out of refined gunpowder.
ZU's LURKERTRACKER DOES NOT TRACK FoS'
IT TRACKS VOTES AND THE POSTS.
THINK0028'S LURKERTRACKER TRACKS FoS', VOTES, POSTS AND HAS A HANDY LINK TO SHOW RESULTS!
Check it, and weep.
There is no (very little at best) chance that we're facing a full blown cult here given SAID ATTACK, and the context behind cults.
Could be 3rd party with a kill. Why are you so against the idea of a cult? Do you think it'd be better to lynch a 3rd party SK, or kill a cult member?
I'm against the idea of a cult because someone did an attack and someone confirmed it. It's circumstantial evidence. Indirect proof given that-with general knowledge of cult-types lacking a factional NK-the attack was a scum-strike. Evil-but-not-demonic third party, perhaps. Or an overeager Town/possible Third-party(?) hunter as said before. Or probably a new role like an assassin (though it'd be weird that it isn't unblockable).
I think it be better to lynch all of said choices, as I have no idea on who the target is until roleflip.
And lastly,
If you will not bother with following my arguments, perhaps you should bother with trying to follow your own. I did ask this one for you to clarify, as it is by all standing,
your accusation.
As you ponder upon this, I'd like to ask you one thing. For most of me, I'm nailing you down as scum. Bad, evil, meanie scum. But I am curious on one prospect.
Why.Why would you resort to such tactics? I'll give you the figurative benefit of the doubt. If scum, then that's quite a nice wallflower to crumble from. A minor wallflower, as it relates to dodging a trivial case on 'I accuse YOU for vote pattern'ing!'. And yet you dodge it. I have outlined with links and quotes, used a lurkertracker which has the accuracy and acuity of an eagle in flight against the swift and ignorant rabbit. I have checked and rechecked your argument against me--nay, all arguments against me--and found yours lacking, given it a prod, and see it explode like a pus-filled boil.
Is my case that confusing? What reason am I not presenting clearly? Is there anything that does not match? Are you confusing me with someone else? Are you, and I speak in sincere concern, alright IRL?
Also missed this.
And now that NQT brings on further evidence: Since when has your vote decided to stick on Nerjin given that point?
Everyone: Check the notes.
Lurkertracker does not lie (or I'm a really good formatter). Despite how fraught I see Caz' playstyle being and..how shaky it is on contact with me--I'm doubting myself and my proficiency in English. Is what I say understandable?
Caz's day end lynch vote on Nerjin was an RVS vote!
You're voting me because I ended up going for the same person I RVS'd? O_o How do you come to this conclusion?
I'll annoyingly cut in for him: You really,
really, didn't change your vote, ever.
Ever.
Persus: Did you notice what material was his sword made of? Any distinguishing feelings other than him being...astute(?) as I read it? [I'm in
PFP mode as of the moment..sorry. ]
ToonyMan: Read back on Caz. Report back. What is your read. What has been your read on me and him.
Why or how couldn't you relate what you just said earlier. Like,
in my post here.