Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Nerjin]

I hope you realize how I can be very busy. Anyway I was about to get around to a catch-up read. May I ask you a quick question, I don't expect you to answer until after I answer yours [as is only fair], but I'm wondering why your language in that most recent post seems so desperate. My question is this: Why are you so desperate to get people voting for me? Are we pressuring a buddy of yours?

[Cheeetar]

I hope you realize how I can be very busy. Anyway I was about to get around to a catch-up read. May I ask you a quick question, I don't expect you to answer until after I answer yours [as is only fair], but I'm wondering why your language in that most recent post seems so desperate. My question is this: Why are you so desperate to get people voting for me? Are we pressuring a buddy of yours?

Who in this post is 'we'- are you using it in the royal form, or referring to everybody in general? Who exactly do you think you are pressuring? Why did you unvote Iqovian- did you realise how poor your reason for voting for him was, or was there anything specifically that convinced you he was innocent? Your reasons for voting Birdy, by the way, are... he didn't answer a question quickly enough for you, and he thinks Toaster is town.

So let's see what you've done here... you've unvoted a person without explaining why (although you were voting for him for very flimsy reasons in the first place), you've voted for another person without really explaining why except saying that you've stated your suspicions in a different post (and they were very flimsy suspicions), and you're replying to my posts and other people's but you're too busy to explain yourself.

[Nerjin]

In that case I think I'll go with my second pick. Unvote

Birdy51

The bolded words. What do they refer to? In addition, why the late extension vote nearly three hours later?


I learned this morning that I will be attending a funeral here pretty soon. Family died on Sunday and I did not hear about it until early this morning. To those paying attention to this post, count it is as a double reason for not voting. I don't think I can be fully involved in this game right now, and voting anyone right now would be a bit irresponsible.

They refer to the three way tie in votes. A lynch day 1 is better than no lynch. I'm just about as suspicious as you as I am Iquovian so I'm willing to wait until tomorrow [in game] to continue to build a case.

And my reasons for suspecting Birdy are that he dodged a question with such intensity that it set off an alarm for me. He dodged it around four or five times.

[Cheeetar]

And my reasons for suspecting Birdy are that he dodged a question with such intensity that it set off an alarm for me. He dodged it around four or five times.

Because an innocent townie like you would never dodge a question, right? He at least answered his in the end.

[Nerjin]

Are you aware of what dodging a question is? I've got a bunch of players to go through, a ton of posts to sort out, and I'm going to answer your damn questions here in a little bit. If you could please be patient I'll have your questions in a moment.

[Cheeetar]

Are you aware of what dodging a question is? I've got a bunch of players to go through, a ton of posts to sort out, and I'm going to answer your damn questions here in a little bit. If you could please be patient I'll have your questions in a moment.

I'm not sure if you know, but the day is ending quite soon. Stop trying to get me to stop pressuring you and just answer the questions. If you're innocent, you won't have to think too hard to answer them because you don't have to worry about implicating yourself in anything, right?

[Nerjin]

I'm ignoring any further discussion with you until I finish up my reads. The day is going to be extended. So if you don't like it then you can deal with it. I'll have your answers soon enough.

[Imp]

Right now we have 8 extend votes: birdy, Imp, Cheeetar, TolyK, Nerjin, Shakerag, Tiruin, Hapah, and no shortens, so we got our extend.

Time pressure exists but isn't like, a few more seconds to go.

Sorry for brevity for now, still at work and have to get back too it.  I'll get a post with answers and questions up tonight.

[Cheeetar]

Right now we have 8 extend votes: birdy, Imp, Cheeetar, TolyK, Nerjin, Shakerag, Tiruin, Hapah, and no shortens, so we got our extend.

Time pressure exists but isn't like, a few more seconds to go.

Sorry for brevity for now, still at work and have to get back too it.  I'll get a post with answers and questions up tonight.

Alright, phew.

[Toaster]

Extend to be sure.


Doubt I'll be able to get a coherent post out tonight- early work tomorrow.

[TheWetSheep]

Birdy: You haven't responded to this post.

I know I promised more, but I really can't right now.

[Tiruin]

Only have time to answer questions I missed.

Imp

Tiruin: Why do you like me so much?  I know why I like you, but I have no idea why you like me!

..You like me? O_o _Yay
I like you because of personality. I am attracted towards personality, purely. Nothing else. I see aspiration and potential in you, and the developing mind of an analytical person. Perhaps an abstract thinker who can rationalize beyond the limits of most people, argue with the greatest of philosophers, and still keep to their principles. It's a generally good thing which has no application to Mafia (..or as far as I see it anyways). Err, just like I like everyone else here because we're one big bunch of gunslinging paranoid people, at times? Yes, that.

NQT

Tiruin— if you're a benevolent third party will you be tempted to claim early again?

I don't trust people anymore for that, thanks to the backlash I got in that one game where I did. And that nobody believed me. And other vehement feelings caused by being attacked and ignored and all that in favor of the more 'powerful' enemy and all that.

No. I'd just shut up and let others die for all I care. Which would reinforce the stupid 'kill all third-parties haahahaahaha' note I was officially against. But yeah, I'll just shut up and leave you people to die in ignorance.

Yes I felt really spiteful when I wrote this.

The Iqovian, Tiruin— you guys still about? Got any read on the game yet?

I-..I...
I don't have a total read yet, but..I'm honestly busy at the moment and have been busy-of varying intervals-in the past days in order to justify getting any read. I wouldn't ask for a replacement because it would either give the replacer a harder time to get all this reads up, and I know that I got it in my to take this on.

..I'll get back to you later on. I am a horrible player.

birdy51

Now, I note that you use the word tangible in your response. This suggests that you might be actually implying the very opposite of what you are trying to say. In others, I believe that your role is intangible, something that cannot be touched. Furthermore, you related to me the fact that you are not a monster and that you are a person. What is not a monster and can't be touched? Casper the Friendly Ghost. I have you all figured out now.

...It's still a generality. I just made it more specific than 'whatever my role can be'.
Also I'm not Casper. If that was the context...I have a lot of supernatural thoughts to pick. :3

All of this attention makes me feel loved inside. ^.^ Back to business!

...Everyone loves everyone here equally. Hence them drawing knives and guns and other pointy killy things to get this game rolling.


Cheet

Tiruin, people have fairly high hopes for you this game, but you've yet to make a second post after your first. Do you have any thoughts on the answers to the questions you've asked?

...Yeah. Second post is here, and its only answering queries directed at me with lack of poking at posts due to busy-ness :/ Though I'm unsure on the 'high hopes' put on my shoulder. It just seems that people want to mark me either as a volatile, unstable element which is good if its Town (harmless to them[?]) or bad if scum (...come to think of it, Nerjin's question didn't put in the context of 'considering that you're of x alignment' when he asked the Top Town/Scum want-picks)...

...Well, they're declarative, and show what the person wants. Not much I can pick from those I asked since..well, it seems satisfactory enough, and that I can't think of, and find any other gain from questioning the answers set from my question since then. Well, except for Nerjin.

Everybody else, I hope you realise how scummy it is that Nerjin is just completely ignoring my questions.

...What's the difference with Nerjin being scummy here compared to me who had 'ignored' questions until now?
Nerjin

Spoiler: @Tiruin (click to show/hide)

Ah yes the eternal monster of Real Life. Hope that gets sorted out soon. We miss you!

Anyways… Once you get the chance I’d like to hear you view on the events that have transpired in your absence and who you think is most scummy.

...Will have to wait till next post.
However, here, I didn't see it until Cheet asked (due to realization) but you didn't draw any place where the answerer would put themselves in to answer your question, huh. Is there anything else you can glean from it? Because I'm seeing those answers by people now-less of a general viewpoint and more of connected to their alignments.

...It's a vague thing I can't fully explain, but I see some pattern there.

PFP -  // // are my twohree predominant moods IRL and thus I believe I'll be lacking to post in quite a few hours because stuffy stuffs.

I'm...ok.

[Cheeetar]

Everybody else, I hope you realise how scummy it is that Nerjin is just completely ignoring my questions.

...What's the difference with Nerjin being scummy here compared to me who had 'ignored' questions until now?

Nerjin's been around and posting, but not answering my questions, which is a way a scum could be 'active' but still try to avoid being scumhunted. You haven't been around at all, and I trust that you've been legitimately busy with real life stuff.

[Nerjin]

More reads on EVERYONE!!! Again with spoilers. I’ll be summarizing my previous statements at the beginning of the spoiler. Onto the show.

Spoiler: @Birdy51 (click to show/hide)

My reasons for suspicion on Birdy51 at the time were based primarily on the fact that he never answered the question “Why did you ask Cheetar if he was satisfied with his role?” instead of simply answering the question he got very defensive. Now onto his new posts to see if anything has changed:

All of this attention makes me feel loved inside. ^.^ Back to business!


TheWetSheep:

Birdy:

Given that I had innocent intentions when I wrote the question, it causes me to ponder what in particular made that one post stand out to you.

So any attack on you when you're town merits an OMGUS-y vote because you know that you had innocent intentions?

Now you are become a tad unreasonable.

   - If he had answered "no", it would have been a rather off-color gesture against Wuba. Regardless of the performance, the audience claps, does it not? The same is with these roles. I would have been surprised by any answer, except for yes. To say "no" is to not clap, and instead hiss at the performers like a cat.
   - Here's another sticking point. The word "could" is rather open. However the fact of the matter is, I wasn't asking to him to reveal any vital elements about his role, or even whether his role was a person, place, or thing.
   
Secondly, no. I dodged the question because I actively mistrust both your question and your intentions. I believe I have right to question arguments made against me.

So you gave Cheetar a question that had little to do with anything? "Either Cheetar says yes or he's a dick to wuba"? Well played Birdy, you either gave him a softball or are trying to play to the mods ego. I believe the former. To your second point: YOU DO NOT DODGE QUESTIONS BECAUSE YOU DO NOT TRUST INTENTION! You avoid questions if you have something to hide.

I dodged "a" question [. . .]. Further, I have since justified said dodge, as I wanted to know why he asked the question in the first place.

Justified it? Yes. Had a good reason for you dodge? No. As you said: You dodged because you didn’t trust the intent. For the question asked that is NOT a good enough reason to not answer.

In addition, why the late extension vote nearly three hours later?

I realize I didn't answer this. I extended [1 hour later by the way] because some people have not voted and so many people wanted an extension that I felt they had something to say. I'm always happy to give an extend if it'll give us more to work with.
Summary: You’re reasons for avoiding answering the question are NOT good enough to make up for the fact that you did dodge it.

Spoiler: @Cheetar (click to show/hide)

I pointed out, in my last address on everyone, that Cheetar was acting very passively but hadn’t really contributed anything to the group. I asked him to do so. Let’s see what he’s done since shall we?
Well annoyed me is one thing that jumps out at me. He’s also absolutely inflated his post count. In conjunction with NQT’s point that town tends to have higher post counts I think there might be some correlation.  But before that I have questions to answer. I will answer all of them.
QUESTION ANSWERING TIME!

Right now?

Yes.

is Iqovian just an easier target, given that he's newer to this style of Mafia than everybody else?

The reason I was voting him is because he expressed interest in shifting blame to other people. I found it scummy.

Why are you so concerned with who everybody else thinks is scum? Shouldn't you be focusing on your own investigation instead of finding out who the easiest person to bandwagon on is?

I'm concerned with others view of scum because Mafia is a game of communication. I need to know what others think so that I can get a good view of them. I am focusing on my own case, in case you haven't noticed I've read the whole thread and addressed EVERY player. I'm putting a lot of work into this.
Alrighty, that’s done. Now onto actually addressing things he’s said.

[spoiler=@Cheetar]

Cheeetar:

[. . .] The good guys tend to be reactive- police wait for people to commit crimes before arresting them, and so on. Aggressively questioning people can make them implicate themselves, but so can analysing the posts they make, and even townies can say stupid things that seems suspicious if they feel under pressure.

Have you had much trouble in games, with a more 'reactive' style of play being taken as a more 'passive' one, and thus being seen as Scummy?  If this was to happen in the future, how would you prefer to resolve the concern?

I don't think I've had major problems with it in the past, no. I'd resolve the concern like I'm resolving it with you now- explaining what I'm doing. If that isn't sufficient, and you feel you'd ought to lynch me for what I see as a valid way of playing town, then I personally think you'd be being scummy by trying to find an excuse (any excuse) to lynch somebody.

I’m glad your analyzing everything. Who do you suspect right now? Do you plan to be more active on Day 2?

It's much easier to be active on Day 2 because there's more to talk about - the results of the lynching Day 1 (if it was scum, who they seemed to be teaming up with or avoiding pressuring at all), the results of the nights actions, any information you yourself may have gotten that's usable.

True. But if you don’t try to say something on Day 1 then no information is available day 2. Day 2 information is the flower that blooms from discussion on Day 1. Don’t use the “Day 2 has more evidence” as a reason to not do anything.
Summary: I don’t even know. He seems to want to wait until Day 2 to actually do anything but he’s VERY protective of Iquovian. I sense there might be a connection there. He also doesn’t seem to get that I have other stuff in my life than mafia. Hypocritical though he is to suggest that I’m not doing enough while he himself is doing very little. Hopefully a second round of getting reads on EVERYONE is enough to convince him that I’m actually doing something. I wish I could be like him. Being pure-town by… not doing anything yet…

Spoiler: @Deathsword (click to show/hide)

My only point towards Death was that he had barely posted and when he did post he did nothing of content. In short: He’s a lurker.

Birdy's assessment of Toaster seems wierd, somehow. Especially his insistant claim that he feels Toaster is town. That implies he has knowledge that others do not. There is also the matter of him dodging questions, as you pointed out. As for activity, it'll increase from now on.

That's nice. Except that you are a liar who lies! Where is this extra activity Deathsword? Do you plan to actually DO something or are you going to lurk the game away? Thanks for agreeing with my posts I guess BUT how about you actually ADD something to the game!?
Summary: ONE post man? A singular post that had very little content? Please bring more FIRE to the game than that man! We need people to play otherwise what’s the fun? Get your ass in gear! Also happy late birthday!

Spoiler: @Hapah (click to show/hide)

I felt that Hapah seemed to be legitimately town at the time. I asked why he voted Toaster but stated that other than that he seemed pretty much on the level.
Huh… You’ve not said much but are apparently busy. I guess my feelings haven’t changed then. You did unvote Toaster and I’m somewhat happy with your reasoning. I’d still like to see your views of the thread though.

Spoiler: @Imp (click to show/hide)

I stated that I felt that Imp was probably town and that they were doing very well for being a newer player. Let’s move onto her/his/its more recent posts though.
Your post against TolyK [specifically the one with the Elmer Fudd reference] seems to beat around the bush a bit. I get what you’re saying but in the future you should try to be more straight-forward.
Summary: Your 5 most recent posts have had 3 with nothing relevant in them [stating you will post stuff later tonight and commenting on the extend] but my feelings have not changed. You still seem town though you REALLY have to cut down on the verbosity and try instead to make your points clear. I look forward to your most recent views on the thread. I hope they do not disappoint.

Spoiler: @Notquitethere (click to show/hide)

I was pretty happy with his play at the time. He seemed genuinely interested in finding scum. I am CERTAIN that I’m confusing him with Zombie Urist for some reason. WHY!?

The Iqovian
Now you're back and paying attention are you going to press a case? Is your distrust of Nerjin enough to vote him on?

This seems like you're trying to push him into voting me. But I think I see what you're doing as a whole and I doubt there was malicious intent behind this.
Summary: Nothing in his posts strikes me as scummy just yet. There are a few close calls but nothing worth explicitly mentioning just yet. For day 1 I’m about as sure NQT is townie as I can be.

Spoiler: @Shakerag (click to show/hide)

My only comment on Shakerag was that his only post at the time seemed appropriate.

birdy51 - upbeat? - seems sharp - possibly town
Cheeetar - poking on lurkers (TolyK) - passive - possibly scum
Deathsword - no strong read
Hapah - no strong read
Imp - inquisitive - maybe a bit cautious - neutral
Nerjin - feels like he's fishing for someone to jump on with asking everyone who they think is scummy - neutral to light scummy
notquitethere - no strong read
The_Iqovian - making appeals to excuse poor/scummy plays - newbie to slightly scummy
TheWetSheep - no strong read
Tiruin - no strong read
Toaster - no strong read
TolyK - setting up self-meta to get away with lurking - commenting on another SK or cult - possibly scum

Hm, okay. I’m glad to see you’re at least keeping up.

TolyK:

TolyK— you've played a lot of role heavy games right? Are there any really common things we should be looking out for?

Well, considering it's a WUBA game, there's likely "another" SK, since he modkilled one instantly, or a cult.
Common things? Don't say everything you know instantly, and always always always check facts with your facts.
And there's always gonna be this crazy jig that ruins a lot of stuff in BYOR's. See: BYO Cards, where my Auto ability gave me a day to myself.

Worried about another SK?  Worried about a cult?  Worried about something ruining your plans?  Hi scum. 

I'm not quite sure (pun not intended... >.>) how you came to that conclusion. I was asked a question for "really common things" to look out for, so I answered to my knowledge. Even if I were scum, I don't think I would have any overarching plans on D1, and I'd be more worried about a cop or something ruining my plans.
But the main thing is, does my answering that way mean that I'm worried about something?

I find it interesting that you chose to make note about there likely being another SK or cult first in your reply.  Makes me think that those things are in the front of your mind.  Which is something that scum would be worried about.  And just because you may or may not have a plan on D1, doesn't mean that you wouldn't be worried about roles that could throw a wrench in your plans later. 

I doubt it. It seems more like he was just answering the question to me. Though I can appreciate the paranoia I suppose… Do you think worrying about a SK is generally a sign of someone being scum?
Summary: Still about the same. A few points towards away from Town and towards Null due to the whole “TolyK is worried about a SK so he must be scum.” Thing. I’m eager to hear the answer to my question.

Spoiler: @TheIquovian (click to show/hide)

My case on him boiled down to the fact that he was HEAVILY lurking and stated early on that he was lurking because there was no one to shift the blame onto… Seemed pretty damn scummy to me. Let’s see what he’s said in the mean-time.

While I'm touched that [Nerjin] read this much into me, I'm pretty sure that you're putting more effort into this than I am. Which is easy, since I am evidently a 'lazy bum'.
Alright, everything that's not #4 [[The post where he states he’s waiting to push blame onto others]] can easily be explained by my being a newbie, and a fairly quiet person. Not very good, but I never claimed to be.
#4 however, was a joke. I made a joke in my first post to try and lighten the mood, I don't think that's a lynchable offense. And right now, I clearly have plenty of blame to shift, that I have accrued in my role as a townie.

Yes, lurking can be explained by that. Not good? Sitting in the corner doesn’t help you get better! A joke is not a lynchable offense no. But it certainly didn’t seem like a joke at the time. Plus it can just as easily be explained as a newb-scum-slip that you’re trying to cover up now. No… I don’t buy that it was a joke.

Iqovian, what did you mean by that statement?

Aside from making a joke, it meant, essentially, 'the game has just started and I have nothing on any of you, nor do I have any reason to go after any of you. I am going to wait until the petty accusations start flying', which they have, hooray!

So your plan was to make a scummy joke and then lurk until you could jump in with someone else's argument? Nice.

The Iqovian, Tiruin— you guys still about? Got any read on the game yet?

I'm still about, but since I haven't been following this actively I don't really have any good reads. Aside from mindless distrust of Nerjin now.

… So… Do you plan to TRY to get good reads or are you just going to stick with an OMGuS?

The Iqovian
Your concern about aattracting attention somewhat ensure that you do attract attention. It's a self-fulfilling prophecy. Now you're back and paying attention are you going to press a case? Is your distrust of Nerjin enough to vote him on?

Actually, yeah I think I will.
He's a bit to quick to leap onto scummy behavior in day 1, and his only real evidence against me is obviously a joke.
Trying to lynch me for a low post count? Go for it. But for making a bad joke? That's reaching.
It looks to me like he's trying to get rid of me - a laudable cause to be sure - but I think his motives this time are more along the lines of 'killing all the townies', than de-scumming the docks.
I now place my vote for Nerjin.

Oh, I'm sorry. You're right. I guess I should jump on townie behavior day 1 because... What? Also, we have vastly varying definitions of "obviously" because I didn't see anything resembling a joke. They usually have punchlines. Yours did not. Work on that for me alright kiddo? I am trying to get rid of you though. I'll admit that. Why? Because you're the scummiest person in the game right now.
Summary: Scum scum scum scum scum… Either that or the biggest Fail-town I’ve seen in a while. I hope you continue playing man. I really do. You seem like a nice guy and all but your behavior is scummy as all hell and if it weren’t for the three way tie I’d be voting your ass right now. Either develop a better case than “Oh my god, you suck Nerjin!” or stop wasting my time with feeble attempts at defense. Please, if you’re paying attention to the thread at all, tell us your secondary scum-suspect.

Spoiler: @TheWetSheep (click to show/hide)

My points towards TWS were that other than Birdy51 he had not really gone after anyone. Let’s see if he’s fixed that or at least expanded his case on Birdy.
Your three posts since my last extravaganza have been rather… Mediocre. You’ve not really pressed anyone but Birdy and have really just kinda made moderate pokes at him. On the whole it seems alright but you need to get more involved. You promise to do so. You’d better follow through.
Summary: Not much has changed. He seems kinda… low on the intensity factor but he’s doing enough for Day 1 that I feel confident in him being slightly town. That being said, TWS, you better get in gear soon.

Spoiler: @Tiruin (click to show/hide)

She stated she was too busy with RL to give much time to mafia. I believe her. Hopefully she has something awesome to make up for it though!
Oh… Guess not. Bad internet leads to lurk. Alright, I’ll keep waiting for you amazing post when you get the time. Oh, nevermind, before posting this she posted something!

I don't have a total read yet, but..I'm honestly busy at the moment and have been busy-of varying intervals-in the past days in order to justify getting any read. I wouldn't ask for a replacement because it would either give the replacer a harder time to get all this reads up, and I know that I got it in my to take this on.

..I'll get back to you later on. I am a horrible player.

Not at all. Real Life is more important. Just get everything sorted out and do your best kay?

However, here, I didn't see it until Cheet asked (due to realization) but you didn't draw any place where the answerer would put themselves in to answer your question, huh. Is there anything else you can glean from it? Because I'm seeing those answers by people now-less of a general viewpoint and more of connected to their alignments.

I'll be honest. I'm not quite following what you're asking me. I'm sure its obvious but I'm just blanking. Could you be more specific?
Summary: Real Life is a dick and gets in the way of our games….

Spoiler: @Toaster (click to show/hide)

I said he seemed alright but that I wanted to hear more when he had time.

Nerjin:

@NQT

Nerjin

@Everyone: Which three players would you most like to be confirmed town and which player would you think is most devastating as scum?

What's your answer to the very same question?

I won't answer that question[/joke]

It's not really a joke if you still don't answer the question, right?

Read the post you're quoting my joke from. Read it really carefully okay? I answered the question.

Hm… It’s been 56 hours. Are you okay? Has anything said during your absence struck you as important?
Summary: Too little content since last time. I worry that our Toaster has gone to Mars and won’t be able to post with content any time soon.

Spoiler: @TolyK (click to show/hide)

He active-lurks. That was my whole thing against him. He’d not said much to anyone but those he didn’t know. I guess the rest of us weren’t important.

I don't hear much about passivity finding Scum.  Could you offer some links to help me find where passive play has been used effectively to assist and ensure Town wins?

This is really painting yourself as town. As in, this is like saying "I'm town", except "Help me work for the town's cause".
It makes you look as if you're trying to make yourself look like a fluffy bunny that's asking for help.
Don't you agree?

Not at all. What she asked was "When has passivity helped town?" and you say that she's trying to make herself look innocent and weak? No. You dodged a question. Answer it or admit that passivity doesn't help town.

I'm sorry if that's wasting your time, however it's mostly you who "wasted" it. It was never my intention to "promise a Broadway show", I was stating what I was going to do. Can you concisely state your case on me, please? And don't try to tack on unrelated things such as rolefishing, which there is no hint of in any of my posts. Thanks.

You dodging the question she asked you and active lurking aren't wasting time? Sorry. I thought they were. Because they are.
Summary: Lurk, lurk, lurk, don’t answer questions. He has a reason for it I’ll admit but I hope he makes actual use of the extension. If not then he’s going to gain some serious suspicion from me.

[Hapah]

Alright, let's see what we've got! I guess I'll start with the 3 vote leaders, yeah?

Spoiler: Nerjin (click to show/hide)

Concerning Nerjin:

He's a bit to quick to leap onto scummy behavior in day 1, and his only real evidence against me is obviously a joke.
Trying to lynch me for a low post count? Go for it. But for making a bad joke? That's reaching.
It looks to me like he's trying to get rid of me - a laudable cause to be sure - but I think his motives this time are more along the lines of 'killing all the townies', than de-scumming the docks.
I now place my vote for Nerjin.

Which doesn't seem to have a reason. It looks more like a reaction to being voted.

This is an incredibly suspicious post. Iqovian hasn't posted as much as other people and that is your only reason to vote for him, disregarding his joke completely flying over your head. There are also other people who you've called out in your post for not posting as much, some of whom have posted even lesss but you seem much less concerned about it- is Iqovian just an easier target, given that he's newer to this style of Mafia than everybody else?

Vote due to choice of target?

Spoiler: Birdy (click to show/hide)

Concerning birdy:

Birdy: How would you play if you were a sk?

Old RVS vote.

Birdy:

TheWetSheep - Do you believe in policy lynching? Ex, kill all Third Parties, lynch the AFKers, lynch all self-voters, ect.

No. I don't think there is any event that always merits the same action; every circumstance must be taken into account.

Cheeetar - Are you satisfied with your role?

I love the smell of rolefishing in the morning. Why did you ask this?

For rolefishing, I guess?

Spoiler: Iquov (click to show/hide)

Concerning Iqov (is it alright if I call you that?):

The Iqovian

Well there's no one to shift any of the large amounts of blame I'm sure to accrue onto yet, and I can't read any of you. So there isn't that much to say, yet.

So your way of forming reads in the face of low-content is to... sit back and answer the handful of questions people pose?

Pressure vote, I think.

Badaboom

Lack of content vote.

Spoiler: Tolyk (click to show/hide)

Concerning Tolyk:

Worried about another SK?  Worried about a cult?  Worried about something ruining your plans?  Hi scum. 

Explains itself, really, though I don't agree. The relevant post is here

Long post

The spoilered bit is the most relevant.

The only one that really looks like it might have teeth is the bits pointing at Tolyk. The others seem like forgotten RVS votes or votes to try to spur people into action.

Nerjin: Why birdy over the other 2 you were tied with? (PPE: Looks like you've detailed your reason a little more in your latest post, but I don't have the time to read it right now).

Shake: Just to make sure I've got this straight; your reasoning for voting Tolyk is contained in this post, right?

NQT: I get what you're doing with Iq, but what's the next step if he doesn't do what you want?

Bed time now. Posting will still be spotty for the next two days, but the traveling for work should be over then. Will try to check thread as much as I can and answer questions directed at me, at least.