Griffionday:Thanks for helping my case.
How am I applying pressure to you again?
'Overeacting', as you put it, is essentially attacking someone after they attacked you. Which applies pressure.
They're not being stupid for the fun of it, they're stupid to get scum to slip up. And I don't see what you're saying, RVS is the best time to do it, since it's the time where there are no reads
Could you give me an example of where being stupid has successfully caught a scum?
Well, there's
BM IV for one. Read MagmaDeath's gambit at the end; he managed to out both scum, but he was lynched anyway from good play from the mafia. I chose that example because it was a BM like the one we're in now.
No, I'm not attempting to hunt badly, I just can't hunt well. Obviously when it comes down to the lynching I'll have refined my case and made sure everything was in order.
This could be a difference in play-style type thing, and this is actually a part of the game I've very little experience with, but shouldn't your pressure argument evolve into your lynch argument and not require a complete reworking?
Yeah? I'd
refine it, not reform it.
Hahaha no.
Firstly, yup, I agree it was originally a weak case. No, I don't agree with your other points.
Secondly, are you saying you're treating me with contempt instead of actually engaging in civilised conversation with me? Wow.
Thirdly, overeacting? I think you're missing the point of RVS. Actually, I'll spell it out for you, since you can't seem to comprehend it yourself. In RVS, you have no reads on anyone. In RVS, you jump on any chance you have to gain reads on someone. In RVS, calling someone out for voting badly is wrong because RVS stands for RANDOM vote stage. My case against you at the start was barely anything. That's because I HAD barely anything. I hope I cleared a few things up for you.
To your first point: yeah, so how did you expect me to react to it? I in part took offence because you
To your second point: I'm admitting that I did precisely that for the first post. Like I mentioned before your case on me is much better now, and I'm actually sort of enjoying this in a weird way. It's an interesting perspective to be on the wrong side of a pressure campaign.
To your third point, I leave the following without further comment:Unvote
RangerCado:
Is that all you have for RVS? A single question which was someone else's turned around? Seems like lazy mafia to me. Anyway, I would probably kill the lurker in this situation, as trying to discern who is mafia through the NKs in complete WIFOM and is discouraged by the ICs.
I was doing exactly what I said I was doing in my third point. Jumping on any opportunity possible. How exactly does this excuse you from commenting?
And about me confusing my terminology, there's no-one confused here about terminology but yourself. I think that you should probably read it yourself before you give it to people and further incriminate yourself.
Nope, still pretty sure I'm less confused about the terminology than you, although that's a petty fight we really should have asked the IC's about ages ago.
Good idea.
I do think that you've answered all of my questions well though, and I'm getting a bit of a townish vibe from you. I think I'll
Unvote. Time to find another target!
Okami No Rei:Griffionday
Crisco brand:
Care to expand on your borno read? I'm not seeing him as scummy right now.
You accused him of playing lazily early on, which indicates he doesn't care about his scumhunting (Scum read). His replies since you started pushing him strike me as nervous and overwrought. He's getting defensive, as in scum scrambling to answer defensive. I can't point to anything in particular, it's simply the overall tone I gather from this post and this one.
Nervous and Overwrought? Nah, I'd say more like angry and bitter. But don't worry,
I've taken my pills I'm feeling better now.
On a more serious note though, are you saying that
because Griffionday accused me of playing lazily indicates that I don't care about my scum hunting? What the hell? I love my scumhunting thank you very much! I've said this at least twice, but I'll tell you a third time.
I am not lazy, I have bad cases because strong cases don't magically appear in RVS stage. Will you at least take the time to read over my posts before making a case on me?
And don't worry about past me's tone, I've made arrangements to have him dead.
RangerCado:From what i've seen, RVS usually ends after about 24-36 hours when everyone has answered about 3 different questions and you start investigating wording, reasons, and why someone has suddenly gone after another. Also, Borno, where are you man? You've been gone for over 30 hours.
I feel special. You miss me being gone for 30 hours when other people have been gone for the whole game but you don't care.
Lastly,
Everyone:If everyone could present their reads, that would be grand. Here are mine:
Griffionday: Seems towny, answers questions and generally helps with the scum hunting. A bit Defensive though
Nerjin: More of a null-read on, hasn't really posted much
RangerCado: Null read, leaning a little town
Deathsword: Also null, doesn't seem to have done much so far
Swordsmith: Leaning town, gives good questions and thorough answers, if sometimes incorrect
Okami: Slightly scummy, rather verbose and
lurky (RL issues)
IG: Slightly scummy, lazy, lurks, active lurking although he says he hates active lurking