Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 305 306 [307] 308 309 ... 341

Author Topic: Additional CIA japes [DPRK Thread]  (Read 552960 times)

Culise

  • Bay Watcher
  • General Nuisance
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4590 on: September 10, 2017, 06:30:41 pm »

And China would never attempt to annex North Korea, that borders on comedy. All of the places that China has annexed over the last century were ones that have been in and out of the control of Chinese governments for a thousand years, which does not include Korea (much).
Eh, Korea's not that much odder than Tibet, where they went in and hammered it, and Vietnam, where they got a bloody nose for their limited gains, withdrew, and subsequently claimed a win regardless.  Besides, there was some muttering from both Korean governments as well as most independent scholars back a few years when China started characterizing Goguryeo as a Chinese state by virtue of its northern territories in Manchuria and Liaodong, which was at its most paranoid extreme viewed as China laying a foundation in Korean history for their more modern "interests" in North Korea.

The real reason China wouldn't be interested in annexing North Korea, rather than any (lack of) nebulous historical viability, is because they sure as sin do not want to inherit the economic and demographic mess that would be entailed in any collapse of the government there.  They aren't even interested in seeing it melt down on their border, hence why they've been rather muted during what has appeared to be the latest wave of purges of potentially pro-Chinese members of government a few years back.  As long as it stays domestically quiescent, they'll tolerate the occasional bellicose action taken against the West. 
« Last Edit: September 10, 2017, 06:33:54 pm by Culise »
Logged

martinuzz

  • Bay Watcher
  • High dwarf
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4591 on: September 14, 2017, 08:43:12 am »

Experts from the research group '38 North' of the US-Korea Institute have come to the conclusion that the last NK nuclear test was stronger than initially thought.
After the test, South Korea reported it was an explosion of about 50 kiloton TNT. Japanese experts estimated it at 150 kiloton.
US intelligence services said they thought it to be 140 kiloton.

According to the new research done by 38 North, it appears it was a bomb of 250 kiloton, making it likely that it was indeed a hydrogen bomb.
For comparison, the nuke dropped on Heroshima, which instantly killed 78000 people had an explosive force of 15 kiloton.

Meanwhile, North Korea threatened today to nuke the US and Japan if sanctions aren't lifted. "Let us reduce the US mainland to ashes! Let us show our wrath by deploying every means of retaliation that we have prepared so far", the committee for external affairs stated.
"The four islands of the Japanese archipelago will have to be sunk into the ocean with the nuclear bomb of Juche".

https://www.volkskrant.nl/buitenland/atoombom-noord-korea-was-17-keer-krachtiger-dan-hiroshima-bom-zegt-denktank-vs~a4516584/
Logged
Friendly and polite reminder for optimists: Hope is a finite resource

We can ­disagree and still love each other, ­unless your disagreement is rooted in my oppression and denial of my humanity and right to exist - James Baldwin

http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=73719.msg1830479#msg1830479

Teneb

  • Bay Watcher
  • (they/them) Penguin rebellion
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4592 on: September 14, 2017, 09:21:44 am »

Are they even capable of reaching the US?

I mean, they are certainly a real threat to Japan now, in addition to the damage they could do to S. Korea and to a lesser extent China, but can they even deliver the bomb across the ocean?
Logged
Monstrous Manual: D&D in DF
Quote from: Tack
What if “slammed in the ass by dead philosophers” is actually the thing which will progress our culture to the next step?

martinuzz

  • Bay Watcher
  • High dwarf
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4593 on: September 14, 2017, 09:27:38 am »

Yes, they can, check the animated globe at the bottom of the news article. They can get about as far as Chicago with their latest missile.

https://www.volkskrant.nl/buitenland/atoombom-noord-korea-was-17-keer-krachtiger-dan-hiroshima-bom-zegt-denktank-vs~a4516584/

http://allthingsnuclear.org/dwright
Logged
Friendly and polite reminder for optimists: Hope is a finite resource

We can ­disagree and still love each other, ­unless your disagreement is rooted in my oppression and denial of my humanity and right to exist - James Baldwin

http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=73719.msg1830479#msg1830479

Antioch

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4594 on: September 14, 2017, 09:32:17 am »

Remind me, why again did the world let North Korea develop nuclear weapons?
Logged
You finish ripping the human corpse of Sigmund into pieces.
This raw flesh tastes delicious!

andrea

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4595 on: September 14, 2017, 09:38:49 am »

A few reasons, depending on which side of the thing you are on

1)For the west, fear of North korea shelling Seoul with their conventional but still quite deadly artillery
2)For China, fear of sharing a border with an USA ally which hosts USA bases (if North korea falls, whatever happens china will see USA military uncomfortably close)
3)For both, fear of impoverished masses and a broken government to deal with, for the post war situation in which somebody has to rebuild NK

Basically, neither side can afford a military engagement in North korea or its results, and North Korea knows it.
« Last Edit: September 14, 2017, 09:40:43 am by andrea »
Logged

Teneb

  • Bay Watcher
  • (they/them) Penguin rebellion
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4596 on: September 14, 2017, 09:41:10 am »

Yes, they can, check the animated globe at the bottom of the news article. They can get about as far as Chicago with their latest missile.

https://www.volkskrant.nl/buitenland/atoombom-noord-korea-was-17-keer-krachtiger-dan-hiroshima-bom-zegt-denktank-vs~a4516584/

http://allthingsnuclear.org/dwright
Well, that's bad.

Also I keep thinking Chigaco is in the US' west coast for whatever reason.

Remind me, why again did the world let North Korea develop nuclear weapons?
It wasn't exactly easy, especially with China thinking it had NK on a leash. NK has excellent terrain for defending, and no one wanted to send their troops into a meatgrinder. Plus what andrea said.

I'd usually say at this point that NK won't actually launch the nuke because that would be a death sentence. But, uh... it's NK.
Logged
Monstrous Manual: D&D in DF
Quote from: Tack
What if “slammed in the ass by dead philosophers” is actually the thing which will progress our culture to the next step?

smjjames

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4597 on: September 14, 2017, 09:58:40 am »

Ideally, rebuilding NK should be an international effort, given how much rebuilding, building, and modernization has to be done. That and Trump is all "No more nationbuilding!". China would probably want some say and investment in it, given that they're already investing in SK.
Logged

Strife26

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4598 on: September 14, 2017, 10:06:26 am »

Ideally, rebuilding NK should be an international effort, given how much rebuilding, building, and modernization has to be done. That and Trump is all "No more nationbuilding!". China would probably want some say and investment in it, given that they're already investing in SK.

It's something even more terrible than nation building, nation building Berlin level ruins by committee without a tenth of the interest organization money!
Logged
Even the avatars expire eventually.

smjjames

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4599 on: September 14, 2017, 10:14:13 am »

Ideally, rebuilding NK should be an international effort, given how much rebuilding, building, and modernization has to be done. That and Trump is all "No more nationbuilding!". China would probably want some say and investment in it, given that they're already investing in SK.

It's something even more terrible than nation building, nation building Berlin level ruins by committee without a tenth of the interest organization money!

I meant more like having SK (well, it'd be a unified Korea by then) lead it with help coming internationally than the US bearing the brunt of it. China, being their neighbor, is going to have interest in it regardless. The SK portion of it doesn't have the economy to go it alone anyway, especially if Seoul got pummelled and the SK portion would have it's own reconstruction to do.
Logged

Starver

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4600 on: September 14, 2017, 10:21:33 am »

Also I keep thinking Chigaco is in the US' west coast for whatever reason.
Even though I do know it's positioned up by the freshwater coast in mid-north-or-actually-a-bit-more-to-the-east, I tend to think of Chicago as grouped with Seattle (and honorarily Canadadadadian,  as well), so maybe you have picked up the same sort impression?
Logged

Descan

  • Bay Watcher
  • [HEADING INTENSIFIES]
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4601 on: September 14, 2017, 11:44:10 am »

Chicago, New York, Portland, Seattle, and San Francisco are kinda all lumped together, even though most of them are entire small(and not so small)-countries-widths apart from each other.
Logged
Quote from: SalmonGod
Your innocent viking escapades for canadian social justice and immortality make my flagellum wiggle, too.
Quote from: Myroc
Descan confirmed for antichrist.
Quote from: LeoLeonardoIII
I wonder if any of us don't love Descan.

MetalSlimeHunt

  • Bay Watcher
  • Gerrymander Commander
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4602 on: September 14, 2017, 12:24:45 pm »

Portland and Seattle are also drastically smaller than the other entries on that list.
Logged
Quote from: Thomas Paine
To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, and whose philosophy consists in holding humanity in contempt, is like administering medicine to the dead, or endeavoring to convert an atheist by scripture.
Quote
No Gods, No Masters.

Descan

  • Bay Watcher
  • [HEADING INTENSIFIES]
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4603 on: September 14, 2017, 03:57:13 pm »

Yeah but we're talking about (international especially) impressions, not reality.
Logged
Quote from: SalmonGod
Your innocent viking escapades for canadian social justice and immortality make my flagellum wiggle, too.
Quote from: Myroc
Descan confirmed for antichrist.
Quote from: LeoLeonardoIII
I wonder if any of us don't love Descan.

martinuzz

  • Bay Watcher
  • High dwarf
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4604 on: September 14, 2017, 06:02:29 pm »

Threaten to nuke Japan into the sea, and within 12 hours after that launch a missile over Japan? Yeah, looks like he REALLY wants to start a nuclear war.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/14/world/asia/north-korea-missile.html?mcubz=3

I kinda have to praise Trump at this moment for showing restraint, unless there's already a few 100 missiles flying to NK right now as we speak.
« Last Edit: September 14, 2017, 06:04:17 pm by martinuzz »
Logged
Friendly and polite reminder for optimists: Hope is a finite resource

We can ­disagree and still love each other, ­unless your disagreement is rooted in my oppression and denial of my humanity and right to exist - James Baldwin

http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=73719.msg1830479#msg1830479
Pages: 1 ... 305 306 [307] 308 309 ... 341