Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 306 307 [308] 309 310 ... 341

Author Topic: Additional CIA japes [DPRK Thread]  (Read 541320 times)

Antioch

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4605 on: September 14, 2017, 06:05:55 pm »

One of the things I was wondering about is what would happen if the North Korean government DID collapse.

A civil war in a country armed with nuclear weapons is an almost impossible situation.

You don't hear about that aspect of nuclear proliferation a lot.
Logged
You finish ripping the human corpse of Sigmund into pieces.
This raw flesh tastes delicious!

Loud Whispers

  • Bay Watcher
  • They said we have to aim higher, so we dug deeper.
    • View Profile
    • I APPLAUD YOU SIRRAH
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4606 on: September 14, 2017, 06:06:43 pm »

Oop, apparently there's been ANOTHER missile that's gone and flown over Japan.

At this point I think Kim's actively trying to antagonise the T-man into declaring war.
Nah I think it's more China saying that Turnip making the first move will mean they will back Norkea, giving Nokea the confidence needed to continue shotting missiles at American allies

martinuzz

  • Bay Watcher
  • High dwarf
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4607 on: September 14, 2017, 06:08:23 pm »

I wonder what would happen if the US fired some fake missiles over NK territory
Logged
Friendly and polite reminder for optimists: Hope is a finite resource

We can ­disagree and still love each other, ­unless your disagreement is rooted in my oppression and denial of my humanity and right to exist - James Baldwin

http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=73719.msg1830479#msg1830479

Paxiecrunchle

  • Bay Watcher
  • I'm just here, because actually I don't know*shrug
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4608 on: September 14, 2017, 06:09:00 pm »

I wonder what would happen if the US fired some fake missiles over NK territory

Nothing good? Mixed international praise and condemnation?

Loud Whispers

  • Bay Watcher
  • They said we have to aim higher, so we dug deeper.
    • View Profile
    • I APPLAUD YOU SIRRAH
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4609 on: September 14, 2017, 06:11:14 pm »

I wonder what would happen if the US fired some fake missiles over NK territory
Nothing good? Mixed international praise and condemnation?
International praise, domestic condemnation (and praise)

smjjames

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4610 on: September 14, 2017, 06:17:59 pm »

Oop, apparently there's been ANOTHER missile that's gone and flown over Japan.

At this point I think Kim's actively trying to antagonise the T-man into declaring war.
Nah I think it's more China saying that Turnip making the first move will mean they will back Norkea, giving Nokea the confidence needed to continue shotting missiles at American allies

I think 'first move' here means doing a pre-emptive strike thing. Pretty sure 'shooting down a missile to defend themselves/ourselves' doesn't count.

Though yeah, that's hella provocative what with shooting more missiles over Japan. Makes the chances of a miscalculation even higher, whether it's a missile commander with an itchy trigger finger or something else.

One of the things I was wondering about is what would happen if the North Korean government DID collapse.

A civil war in a country armed with nuclear weapons is an almost impossible situation.

You don't hear about that aspect of nuclear proliferation a lot.

It's also a concern about Pakistan, as that country isn't real stable. Actually, it happening in Pakistan would be an even worse situation.
« Last Edit: September 14, 2017, 06:20:01 pm by smjjames »
Logged

Antioch

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4611 on: September 14, 2017, 06:28:17 pm »

It does give some perspective about sanctions.

What is the goal of economic sanctions on North Korea?

Is it to convince North Korea to give up their weapons? -> fat chance of that happening.

Is it to collapse the North Korean government? -> That is possibly the WORST thing that could happen in this crisis.

Logged
You finish ripping the human corpse of Sigmund into pieces.
This raw flesh tastes delicious!

smjjames

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4612 on: September 14, 2017, 06:32:06 pm »

We've done about all that we can sanction that either: 1. China and Russia won't veto or negotiate down. or 2. Threaten to make the NK regieme collapse. or 3. Create a humanitarian crisis that precedes a collapse.
Logged

misko27

  • Bay Watcher
  • Lawful Neutral; Prophet of Pestilence
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4613 on: September 14, 2017, 07:11:34 pm »

I'm sure nothing but good things will come of this.
Logged
The Age of Man is over. It is the Fire's turn now

Egan_BW

  • Bay Watcher
  • Normalcy is constructed, not absolute.
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4614 on: September 14, 2017, 07:26:17 pm »

fire and fury like the world has never seen
believe me
Logged

Paxiecrunchle

  • Bay Watcher
  • I'm just here, because actually I don't know*shrug
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4615 on: September 14, 2017, 07:46:29 pm »

May I suggest retitling this thread: "Worlds greatest dickmeasuring contest: Gone nuclear, Gone wrong" ?

MetalSlimeHunt

  • Bay Watcher
  • Gerrymander Commander
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4616 on: September 14, 2017, 07:47:58 pm »

There is nothing more sacred in my sight than the title of DPRK Thread, and that ain't it.

When the time is right, the title shall arise.
Logged
Quote from: Thomas Paine
To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, and whose philosophy consists in holding humanity in contempt, is like administering medicine to the dead, or endeavoring to convert an atheist by scripture.
Quote
No Gods, No Masters.

Paxiecrunchle

  • Bay Watcher
  • I'm just here, because actually I don't know*shrug
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4617 on: September 14, 2017, 07:53:23 pm »

There is nothing more sacred in my sight than the title of DPRK Thread, and that ain't it.

When the time is right, the title shall arise.

But the current title....where did that even come from?I just don't get it.

MetalSlimeHunt

  • Bay Watcher
  • Gerrymander Commander
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4618 on: September 14, 2017, 08:14:42 pm »

Consider: A proper thread title must be exceptionally poor.
Logged
Quote from: Thomas Paine
To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, and whose philosophy consists in holding humanity in contempt, is like administering medicine to the dead, or endeavoring to convert an atheist by scripture.
Quote
No Gods, No Masters.

Teneb

  • Bay Watcher
  • (they/them) Penguin rebellion
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4619 on: September 14, 2017, 08:14:50 pm »

There is nothing more sacred in my sight than the title of DPRK Thread, and that ain't it.

When the time is right, the title shall arise.

But the current title....where did that even come from?I just don't get it.
Our title is backed by the power of nuclear weapons! It needs no justification.
Logged
Monstrous Manual: D&D in DF
Quote from: Tack
What if “slammed in the ass by dead philosophers” is actually the thing which will progress our culture to the next step?
Pages: 1 ... 306 307 [308] 309 310 ... 341