Maybe LW would like to correct me here, but I never took him as being serious about any of that. LW lives (or has lived) in London in which White British now make up less than half the population (as few as 17% to 30% in some boroughs). You couldn't seriously hold the view that there's impending Islamification of Britain if you live almost anywhere else in the country.
Well I'm not sure what Frumple is going on about with Islamic penetration; a poor choice of phrasing after the Muslim rape gangs did just that with thosuands of English children hahahaha; where was their protection from some virile halal skewering. I think there's no pleasing anyone with anything I say, so I consider it a job well done if everyone is pissed off.
I grew up in southeast london (people from africa and the indian-subcontinent, generally not muslim) on the border with east london (people mostly muslim from indian-subcontinent/egypt, recently also from Arabia) and in a moderate muslim country where they're currently undergoing some serious islamicization and what I'm worried about is not the Islam I grew up with, it's something new. Four generations of my family have not seen this. Stronger, certainly strong enough that I won't count on progressives to be able to stop them when they have enough momentum
It's hilarious when Al-Shabab bubbas are calling tower hamlets an Islamic Citadel! As for what I believe? Will it defeat Britain? No. When they tried infiltrating out schools they were shut down and we still have large numbers of Muslims who are not too happy with Islamism, and people have stopped listening to progressives so there's no chance they'll be able to shout those Muslims down. East London maybe, but if they're just in East London then all it means is I get to get more free jihad books from preachers and bants with big bearded fellows. If the rest of Europe wants to keep its heart open and wrists limp it just means it's even funnier everytime they go about ultraviolent bants
SNP won in Scotland exactly because they are Old Labour. Old Labour should do well if elections are held tomorrow.
When the two main parties are right wing with right face, and right wing with left face, why would you opt for the latter?
SNP won in Scotland because labour couldn't be counted on to secure devomax for Scotland.
Look, I'm going to break down why you're wrong on every point and then I'm going to stop arguing with you because you're obviously delighted at the prospect of thousands of hidden sleeper agents and I don't need to ruin your fun.
My taint is ready
If the pair had killed for Satan it wouldn't prove Satan was infiltrating refugees. Your grip on reality needs tightening.
This girl becomes infatuated with ISIS after hitching up with a new Swede
tm and then kills her mother in the name of ISIS (or perhaps her Iraqi refugee boyfriend, or both - the court could not prove it) after watching hours of ISIS beheading people. That's adorable naivety it proves nothing fug :
DDDDDDDDD
It's funny that you actually believe the propaganda when the logistics of it make no sense whatsoever.
Right, so I posted how:
*ISIS fought for the Turkish border
*Has been working in cooperation with human traffickers (earlier on I even posted how the human traffickers were toting serious artillery in Libya because of their connections)
*How ISIS fighters have already been caught in refugee camps
*How ISIS manuals have described how to exploit refugee status to move throughout Europe
*How thinktanks and ISIS operatives themselves have said they have sent ISIS through Europe by exploiting refugee status
*How Islamist militiants already did this and carried out attacks
*How most are returning not to strike yet, but to spread Islamism as teachers and instructors, not fighters
*How ISIS soldiers from Europe express their intent to return to Europe
And this to you is proof you are right
k :
D
1. It's funny that you actually believe the propaganda when the logistics of it make no sense whatsoever.
2. The Lebanese minister said he had no facts, just his "gut feeling" that it was happening. Pro-tip: don't just google for articles that support your bizarre world-view and paste them here without reading them first.
3. Fanatics are going to be fanatic. No relevance to the refugee stuff.
4. What's this even from?
5. Read Claudine's comment in the article. If this is their plan, then they're a more incompetent than usual jihadi.
6. Yes, like Britain there are individuals who successfully manage to leave the country to fight for ISIS and some of them even manage to return. This isn't news and it doesn't mean ISIS has a mass policy of infiltrating refugees which is the bizarre and paranoid article of belief that I'm specifically objecting to.
7. Yes, he had a false identity as an asylum seeker. I can't see that he actually tried to seek asylum.
8. Ugh, Breitbart. This just shows what a ludicrous plan infiltrating refugees actually is, as if they take anything actually useful for being a terrorist they're easily spotted. Five idiots at the Bulgarian border is not equal to '4,000 ISIS fighters' or '1/50 refugees' or whatever bullshit figure your cleaving to.
9. It's funny they call him a 'government advisor', he's actually a British-Libyan gun runner for the rebels. Are these the same smugglers that purposefully sink their boats? The thing is, this just really doesn't strike me as a plausible plan. I'm not saying there are 100% zero IS-friendly people among the refugees, I'm sure they have a range of beliefs, but thinking that instead of concentrating on their war on three+ fronts, the IS top brass would send off thousands of men to drown or starve or be caught or imprisoned or robbed, when they could just fly people to the desired country as per usual. Tourist visas and fake passports are a thing, in case you wondered.
1. Explain how the logistics make no sense, a baseless assertion is baseless. It's quite simple, get to Turkey, from Turkey to the Schengen Area and you're sorted.
2. I didn't try pass the Lebanese minster's claim as more than a claim, don't conduct plebbit-tier shitflinging without reviewing your life first.
3. ISIS fighters declaring their intent to return home has no relevance to ISIS fighters returning home. NOPE, NONE AT ALL BEGONE CITIZENS
4. Cheeki Jihad book
5. It's funny that you go to Claudine's comment when the article IS LITERALLY ABOUT AN ISIS FIGHTER INSIDE THE CAMP CLAUDINE IS DENYING ISIS IS USING
Claudine pls
What Claudine from the Salaam British Muslim charity failed to mention was that Britain's border has identity checks; a false visa or passport will be shut the fuck down if your fingerprints don't match or if some suits are expecting you to come home from a "holiday." Funniest moment has to be when my Algerian friend got some serious interrogation from Americans as a result of some suspicious travel patterns :
D
6. So ISIS members going abroad to fight in Syria and Iraq returning home is not evidence of ISIS fighters returning home. ??
?
I can't argue with denial
P.s. if ISIS is not as uneducated and idiotic as you believe, you will not find them - especially with no border checks, you will never know. The reason why I keep posting examples from Britain is because Britain still has border checks and one of the greatest security bureaus in the world, both internal and external and with the English channel separating us from the continent giving us more control to the vetting process of refugees. What we can't catch, you sure as hell won't - and what we do, is a blip of what you won't. So either make like a South East Goat and open the floodgates of heaven to this or wait for fireworks time. Or if you're not European, join me with popcorn because despite our disagreements the outcome is the same. Europe has shit tier security bureaus (France aside) and zero border control outside of the Balkans (hence why you'll note the only ISIS fighters masquerading as refugees so far caught have been caught in Bulgaria or Calais - two places within Europe where borders still exist). Everywhere else? You'll never know! Ever! That one think tank I gave earlier has the more reliable estimate of 1,300 fighters having already made their way back to Yurop, but as Britain alone still has 2,000 fighting in Syria I await that number to gorilliatreble.
7. Can't argue with denial
8. Can't argue with denial
9. Sir don't you dare insult the Abdul Basit Haroun, he knows 1000x more Jihad bants than you and is a credit to the Syrian rebels that are fond of such niceties as not being a murderous holocaust machine. He's fought ISIS, even becoming a rebel commander, has worked with America, Britain, Libya in fighting ISIS and he is an invaluable source of information since he's on the ground (or in this case, on the boats) and knows his stuff and his contacts. He's not only a government adviser, he's also a smuggler who knows his smuggling!
And I do believe part of the strategy is that thousands of men don't starve, drown, be caught, imprisoned or robbed. A support network sent them to Syria, it is unlikely that network died from old age in the time they were gone.
Well duh, those immigrants are from mostly non-Free market and barely-Capitalist countries. If you let those kind of people in, economy is sure to collapse because they are just unable to adapt. Unable!
Open them doors wider amiright, 300,000 a year is nothing, we should do 1,000,000
Why not 1,000,000,000?
They have no manners, no civility, they are just swarming our beautiful Europe and demanding stuff!
Top lel
Not to mention they are slightly brown! And they are of different religion!
Are white people are messed up or what
Poll
Author
Topic: Sheb's European Megathread: Remove Feta! (Read 1777303 times)