Hi Vector! I missed you!
Dariush, tell me, why do you state that someone is scum, vote them, and then shift your vote to the first person to attack you (NQT in this case)?
I've explained it already. His '100% mislynch record' argument, combined with the fact that among him and you at least one is guaranteed scum was sufficient grounds for a vote.
But you had a good case on DS, and about his argument, sure it may be fallible and it may be him touting it as a defense, but you stated this:
While I am definitely suspicious of NQT, with every passing post he begins to press less on my 'scum' and more on my 'town newbie who is trying really hard and kinda failing' sensors. DS, on the other hand, has been doing a whole load of nothing ever since... uh, I don't know. I go back and back through the thread looking at his posts and find answering questions, weakly pushing NQT and speculation and nothing more.
So...his only post between that (refer to quote linked above)
was this, and you seem to be agitated thoroughly by that.
Your reply? It could've been to rebuke him. To right what he said about you and your 100% mislynch record, to state verbatim. His 100% mislynch theory
is but a theory anyway - he didn't have any conclusive evidence behind it (I mean, yeah. For example: I've got a 100% mislynch record, as does everyone else - did you poke on the illogical consequences of mentioning such?)
100% mislynch record
It would be pretty weird if I had anything but in a game where no scum have been lynched so far. Don't you agree, NQT?
PPE'd by Toaster.
No. You didn't explain what was behind your vote or why NQT deserves it. You could've done such to the newbie, why aren't you reasoning with him? Or at least straightening it out.
PPE: NQT. Darn that rhymes.
...what rhymes with what?
The acronym lettering