PFPI unvoted for NQT
Unvote
in that big post there.
Currently strained for time and my reads are
still going to be posted soon here (sorry >.>), we have 2 days.
Tiruin - I don't know what game he's playing. If he's mason and completely telling the truth then we're doomed. Vote record suggests scum.
Toaster - Vote record leans scum, crypto-lurks with short posts.
Dariush - Vote record leans scum (or taking into account voting blocks, mason), post record show angry strong scum hunting tendencies.
ZU - Vote record suggests town. Legacy arguments from Ford might be worth considering as he was convinced ZU was scum.
Hapah - active playing but standoffish in votes or applying pressure. Essentially a null read, leaning mason.
Obo - Lurker up for replacement. Voted consistently for DS, initially with good reason then later out of laziness. Could be anything.
DS - used to think was scum due to his irrational witch hunt on Ford. Could be mason, if Tiruin is telling the truth.
So, for the third time, can you give me your reads please?
Dariush - I'm pretty unsure, but I believe he's linked with Toaster as the last two remaining scumbuddies judging by how the interactions of their votes have linked up. Sure, NQT may seem like scum for basing all his shtuff on philosophical nature, but I'm not reading much on the philosopher at the moment (also if NQT is scum then that's one darn way of persuading me >.>). Still, mostly a gut feeling.
Tiruin - This is me. I see myself as a mason. Woohoo, masonry!
Phantom of The Library >
Hapah - pretty unsure. Judging by PoTL's posts, I see much townieness in the man. Hapah has always (honestly) been my rolemodel in playing Mafia ever since he
kicked my scummy face in diplomacized the game with his debut entry. I seriously can't see much of him being scum due to how he words his statements - following the correct rules of conversation and being astute, probably even political in his advances. Leans muchly on town for me here.
notquitethere - null read. Leaning town. I'm confused on whether he is town or not due to his philosophical attitude. While it doesn't scream 'WIFOM' or scum to me, it seems he's trying to explain other's statements in a holistic manner in order to...err, do his own kind of scumhunting. Lacks the pressure on his votes though as I see little assertion with it (not saying assertion = scummy, but lacking pressure is what I'm pointing at.)
zombie urist - I've seen him to state opinions muchly, needing a prod or two in order to ask him why he said so or the reason behind his statements so I'm reading mostly of a null-town sort. He has certain conclusive points which say that he's sincere in his scumhunting, not aiming to subtly trip others up and using their words against them.
obolisk0430 - Before his...2 week disappearance (Yeah...>_<), he reads scum to me due to the wording of his posts, the essence behind his votes and his reasoning in judgement. That one post where he used expletives in trying to hurry me up didn't help, but I stand by my idea here. If there isn't any replacement, my vote goes to him (for the time being, of course :/)
Yes I've labelled them to the stereotypical colors for those who want a tl;dr. Yes there is a chocolate color - this means scummy.
Deathsword - mason bro. If you want a general read, I'd say townish. While he's still performing minor mistakes that would be alluded to a mafioso, he's scumhunting in a way I could relate to (when being town, question and question - don't discard the seemingly obvious and all)
Toaster - ^. But I'd generally say scum-ish from a neutral viewpoint. Posts are short and sometimes pointed in a way that it's relaxed or uncaring of the consequence. Though his last sentence says what I can infer on why his attitude has been lackluster, I'm not seeing much else which leads to Null-veryslightlyscum.
PPE: Just realized he's up for replacement :/ Added to the last sentence