If they're acting upon, how is that a limitation to their ability to act upon?
I am speaking of a relationship of "Act and be acted on". Those within that cannot be part of a relationship. (Dang words that are spelled the same but mean different things).
A personal relationship at least.
I simply ask you to carefully evaluate for yourself whether you believe my model is incorrect because you have good reason to believe it's incorrect...
Because I know this model very well and as someone with a conviction to know and understand everything I had to learn what "Balance" is.
As you said LordBucket no woman is a "True" woman because no woman is without man. It is only by being a woman that their main attribute is that of being womanly.
In otherwords they are Woman with the Eye of man. The size of that eye differing from woman to woman. As such the nature of human beings.
This eye is what gives a woman balance because balance is within and without.
However you must also understand LordBucket that a Canvas supposes it is a Canvas because it is painted upon, however the Painter upon being painted may suppose it is a Canvas as well for in its balance one may not distinguish one trait from the next.
Thus does gender not only blur but does it say that an approach to gender must be balanced for gender in it of itself is balanced.
Thus the approach one must make towards a woman is of both woman and man. Thus a man must be both man and woman. He must be a man informed of being a woman.
Thus must both active and passive approaches, actor and prop, action and non-action must be utilised.
simply because pure female or pure male energy is unnatural and undesirable.
simply because it makes you uncomfortable because it clashes with what you've been taught about gender
I have no grand unifying dogma on what makes gender.
Author
Topic: "Why don't women like nice guys?" (Read 44963 times)