Jack
Hapah: Why haven't you posted yet?
How does this constitute a RVS question? Also, why are you asking on the types of RVS questions people 'prefer'?
Tiruin:
*How that is an RVS question: Reaction test-type thing.
*Meta-RVS stuff: I felt like something a bit different than the usual when would you use this ability/what would you do in this situation-type questions. Getting an idea of how the two people I've never seen before think is of value to me, so I asked them about RVS to get some idea of their knowledge of RVS and, in Deathsword's case, how he thinks in-game.
your statement here feels a bit odd, looking at the posts surrounding it
Wait what. Why are you judging my statements based on posts that surround them?
Dariush: "Surrounding" was not the best word I could have used, I admit. A better word would have been "preceding". To answer your question, context is absolutely necessary to best interpret and judge statements. Especially statements making reference to other statements or a lack thereof.
What sorts of differences in reactions would you find interesting? Is there not a significant difference to be expected by default between reactions to UI's post and your backwards, semi-readable repost of it? How exactly are Toaster and Shakerag's comments on these posts not reactions?
1) Difference along the lines of '[vote]Dariush[/vote] for that non-post, blahblahblah' without mentioning UI, or vice versa - '[vote]UI[/vote] for that non-post, blahblahblah' without mentioning me.
2) No, there isn't. Both are non-posts. Favoring one with a serious (meaning non-joke) vote without mentioning the other would reveal a biased viewpoint.
3) Shakerag's was an obvious joke. Toaster's was a question regarding my opinion of my contribution.
1. D'accord.
2. Ah, so by reactions, you definitely mean something as strong as voting. What about reactions of less strength than votes? Stuff like comments and such?
3. They're reactions to your post and Urist's post. They're not the strong reactions you're looking for, but they are reactions.
Overall, what I'm noticing here is that you've gone with a much more extreme interpretation of "reaction" here than what I generally think of, which shows in all of your responses to my questions, and has mostly cleared up what I found questionable.
Mr. Celt: Alright. Now that people are leaving RVS and people are throwing their thoughts on actual matters of importance around, please give us your thoughts on, well...anything going on in the game right now. Also, how many games of Mafia have you played in Bay 12 before?