UI:
I know my opinion on it- I want to know yours. Enlighten me.
The benefit of Plan Eradicate was the removal of a potential LyLo breaker from the game. Now I want to know your opinion.
Why the rush to remove a LYLO breaker when it's your own? Don't try to tell me you weren't in a rush; you were trigger-happy to remove Tiruin.
My opinion is that I want to understand your thought process behind your actions there.
I would say that mis-extrapolating the number of votes to hammer (6p yesterday = 3 to hammer, thus...) is more forgivable than forgetting that a player is dead concurrently with demanding an explanation from the person who hammered him.
Yes, because you did it and not me.
You keep making this about who. It isn't - it's about what.
In the technical sense, yes. It hardly excuses it.
I fail to see how it needs excusing.
Who or what, I still don't like the disparity.
Again, if you're so concerned about using it, why not about losing it?
UI: That's another reason why I wanted him online to do it- to give him less time to think.
You assume he'd default to trusting you.
What else would he do? Say "LA LA I CAN'T HEAR YOU?"
Not trust you because of what usually happens if something is too good to be true. Really, the basic assumption behind your gambit is so naive it's stupid. The question is, if you didn't realize that, why not? You're not that terrible at Mafia that you'd assume scum would trust a townie to explicitly hand him the game. And if you did realize that, what was the point of doing it, other than to confuse the hell out of me for a few minutes while pretending to be productive?
Okay, if he didn't trust me, what would he do as town? Scum? What's your read on him anyway?
Toaster, I'm curious why you're not voting me if I'm your top suspect.
I voted you to make a point- it being made, I unvoted you. Since I'm pretty confident Book is town and fairly sold on you being scum, there's no reason to not vote you, especially if you want to insist.
Urist I.
Leaf: I haven't been giving this game the time and attention it deserves, and my poor activity reflects that. Both previous days the hammer came when I either rereading or getting ready to do so.
I don't see anything from UI about my activity that merits a response other than a repeat of what I said the previous paragraph. Did I miss something?
My case on UI is a mix of what I've already stated, gut, and me not really suspecting either you or Book.
Book: If I had acted, that would have prevented my revive. I chose to have a revive instead of the fairly weak at that point ability to steal a vote. In hindsight, I'd make the same decision.