There are a lot of states that you can't pass resolutions against. Namely, each of the five powers and their allies. Libya was an exception, but that's quite unlikely to happen again given how angry Russia was afterwards.
I'd hardly call Israel a rogue state. And did you even read the article? Their man rights record has nothing to do with it.
It has unregulated nuclear weapons, has them aimed at countries that it is not in a threatened or actual state of war with, refuses to officially acknowledge said weapons, has used conventional incendiary weapons and bombs indiscriminately against civilian populations, and has historically attacked neutral parties that posed no threat.
It is effectively a rogue state.
And yet, the UN has attempted to ask Israel to please stop bombing civilians too many times?
That's not what rogue state means though. You can't just apply words without knowing their definition. If violence against civilians, for example, had anything to do with being rogue, all the world over would be rogue.
Rogue state refers to a certain combination of terrorism, proliferation, and authoritarianism. Israel is hardly authoritarian to its own citizens (which is all that matters for this definition ), I can't remember many terrorists incidents Israel has encouraged, and claiming proliferation is hardly going to impress me, given their anti-nuclear stance (Having nuclear weapons does not make you a proliferator by itself; just think what that would imply). Claiming they have nuclear weapons pointed at European capitals is not impressive when a) there are only rumors, and b) pointing them is hardly the same as intent to use them. If russia was invaded they'd probably nuke Europe too, but they aren't rogue
Israel is not rogue. A pariah perhaps, and you might argue a bully, but not rogue.