I fully agree with this.
However, I am unsure whether 'the democratic process' (competitive lobbying and lawsuits, as well as personal gestures of retracting funding) is quite able to reverse corruption of this magnitude. The tumour is too ingrained in the host.
Such tactics will be effective in slowing its growth, and slowing their response (making new laws) to other attacks, but I fear more is needed to push the RIAA and MPAA back.
It could take the combination of numerous legal (picketing stores that sell their products and publicly support them, etc.) and illegal (jailbreaking devices to run free alternatives, other obviously upstanding acts of 'circumvention', etc.) methods to deprive them of revenue and reflect some of their demonization back upon them; but regardless of the method, some defence against them must be PUBLIC.
The best we can do is make the evening news in a way that forces a positive or at least neutral story. The judges who sign off on **AA-pushed laws lack the attention span or intellect for researching facts further than RIAA.com, but they have shown weakness for soundbites and unexplained quotes of "jobs lost" and "dollars in damage". If we can protest them on these terms, it may shock judges into looking deeper into the economic facts.
Oh, and minimize contact between legal means of resistance and civil disobedience. Remember that under the PATRIOT act, offending the government of the USA (or its masters) means wiretapping of EVERYONE you have communicated with or will communicate with.