Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9

Author Topic: Real-Life Cotton Candy  (Read 10667 times)

Loud Whispers

  • Bay Watcher
  • They said we have to aim higher, so we dug deeper.
    • View Profile
    • I APPLAUD YOU SIRRAH
Re: Real-Life Cotton Candy
« Reply #90 on: November 28, 2011, 06:32:51 pm »

Cannot tell if troll of very christian. LOL DOVAHKIN!

I was a little disappointed by the lack of FUS RO DAH! They didn't even bother looking into the story either. How did they even make those connections? AH AHA HAHAHAAA

Cruxador

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Real-Life Cotton Candy
« Reply #91 on: November 28, 2011, 08:21:00 pm »

It is clearly not sincere. I thought parts of it were amusing, but overall it was too heavy-handed.
Logged

EveryZig

  • Bay Watcher
  • Adequate Liar
    • View Profile
Re: Real-Life Cotton Candy
« Reply #92 on: November 28, 2011, 10:00:54 pm »

You would be surprised at the things people say sincerely.
See: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/PoesLaw
Logged
Soaplent green is goblins!

MrWiggles

  • Bay Watcher
  • Doubt Everything
    • View Profile
Re: Real-Life Cotton Candy
« Reply #93 on: November 29, 2011, 12:38:10 am »

so wouldn't this work well as a lightweight skin for spacesuits rather than the tough plates and thick fabric they have now?

Cover that nanomaille armor with some good strong polymer and you'd be good to go!


Considering that the material is highly porous....I doubt it.
So are the stiff fabrics used currently. They are there to provide strength. There are other materials in the suit which keep the air from escaping.

I didn't say this nanochainmail could also hold air.

This wouldnt really do anything for space suits.

The bulkness, and weight for a space suit, comes from the need to use air to provide the pressure, not the suit itself.

You want space suits to be light, flexible, then you need to think of a different way to apply the pressure needed for the human to function, along with the need to provide for heat, water and waste management.
Logged
Doesn't like running from bears = clearly isn't an Eastern European
I'm Making a Mush! Navitas: City Limits ~ Inspired by Dresden Files and SCP.
http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=113699.msg3470055#msg3470055
http://www.tf2items.com/id/MisterWigggles666#

forsaken1111

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
    • TTB Twitch
Re: Real-Life Cotton Candy
« Reply #94 on: November 29, 2011, 12:51:39 pm »

This wouldnt really do anything for space suits.

The bulkness, and weight for a space suit, comes from the need to use air to provide the pressure, not the suit itself.

You want space suits to be light, flexible, then you need to think of a different way to apply the pressure needed for the human to function, along with the need to provide for heat, water and waste management.
So like a skinsuit with built-in elasticity to apply the appropriate pressure to the body and a dome helmet for breathable air. And then a layer of nanomaile over that to keep it from breaching?
Logged

MrWiggles

  • Bay Watcher
  • Doubt Everything
    • View Profile
Re: Real-Life Cotton Candy
« Reply #95 on: November 29, 2011, 07:48:03 pm »

This wouldnt really do anything for space suits.

The bulkness, and weight for a space suit, comes from the need to use air to provide the pressure, not the suit itself.

You want space suits to be light, flexible, then you need to think of a different way to apply the pressure needed for the human to function, along with the need to provide for heat, water and waste management.
So like a skinsuit with built-in elasticity to apply the appropriate pressure to the body and a dome helmet for breathable air. And then a layer of nanomaile over that to keep it from breaching?

Yep. There's an MIT materiel scientist lady working on it already. It'll even provide sensor net for bodily functions. So far, it mostly works, and progress has been good. The trickier parts, that remain to be solved, is where the morphology of the body is dynamic. Like the armpits, and the back of knees.

Its apparently very hard to keep constant pressure in areas like that.
Logged
Doesn't like running from bears = clearly isn't an Eastern European
I'm Making a Mush! Navitas: City Limits ~ Inspired by Dresden Files and SCP.
http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=113699.msg3470055#msg3470055
http://www.tf2items.com/id/MisterWigggles666#

forsaken1111

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
    • TTB Twitch
Re: Real-Life Cotton Candy
« Reply #96 on: November 30, 2011, 12:26:44 pm »

So like a skinsuit with built-in elasticity to apply the appropriate pressure to the body and a dome helmet for breathable air. And then a layer of nanomaile over that to keep it from breaching?

Yep. There's an MIT materiel scientist lady working on it already. It'll even provide sensor net for bodily functions. So far, it mostly works, and progress has been good. The trickier parts, that remain to be solved, is where the morphology of the body is dynamic. Like the armpits, and the back of knees.

Its apparently very hard to keep constant pressure in areas like that.
Understandable. Sounds like it would be uncomfortable in the underarm and nether regions.
Logged

Shinotsa

  • Bay Watcher
  • Content lion is content
    • View Profile
Re: Real-Life Cotton Candy
« Reply #97 on: December 01, 2011, 12:21:43 pm »

Well it's official - in the future only women will be able to explore a vacuum. No cleaning jokes.
Logged
Quote from: EvilTim
"You shouldn't anthropomorphize vehicles. They hate it"

forsaken1111

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
    • TTB Twitch
Re: Real-Life Cotton Candy
« Reply #98 on: December 01, 2011, 12:24:25 pm »

Well it's official - in the future only women will be able to explore a vacuum. No cleaning jokes.
Guess every spaceship will need a kitchen.

 ;)

Wait wait... Guess there will be plenty of sandwiches in space! Hayo!

 8)
Logged

Loud Whispers

  • Bay Watcher
  • They said we have to aim higher, so we dug deeper.
    • View Profile
    • I APPLAUD YOU SIRRAH
Re: Real-Life Cotton Candy
« Reply #99 on: December 01, 2011, 02:20:29 pm »

I am entranced by your many cats.

RabidAnubis

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Real-Life Cotton Candy
« Reply #100 on: December 01, 2011, 04:03:43 pm »

I hope that people realize in order to manufacture one of these (efficiently) we have to stick with one.
 
I think we should stick with nano tubes and not this- nanotubes have applications in space elevators and civilian armor.  This thing here is too light to do anything, and the information is not detailed enough for me.

Also, strength is done by weight/mass, which means that spider silk has more strength.  They really don't have strength for size, which worries me.
Logged
Dwarf Fortress: Your game is working on giving NPC's lives. Our game is working on giving them a working nervous system.
Aahhh I can't find the fish cakes in the bunny level, they keep getting enraged and I don't have any holy hand grenades
The Age of Myth: Goldenhold

forsaken1111

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
    • TTB Twitch
Re: Real-Life Cotton Candy
« Reply #101 on: December 01, 2011, 05:19:46 pm »

I hope that people realize in order to manufacture one of these (efficiently) we have to stick with one.
 
I think we should stick with nano tubes and not this- nanotubes have applications in space elevators and civilian armor.  This thing here is too light to do anything, and the information is not detailed enough for me.

Also, strength is done by weight/mass, which means that spider silk has more strength.  They really don't have strength for size, which worries me.
Your statement makes no sense at all. We do not have to 'stick with' one thing or another. We as a species are perfectly capable of manufacturing more than one thing at quite high efficiency.
Logged

Loud Whispers

  • Bay Watcher
  • They said we have to aim higher, so we dug deeper.
    • View Profile
    • I APPLAUD YOU SIRRAH
Re: Real-Life Cotton Candy
« Reply #102 on: December 01, 2011, 05:28:30 pm »

I hope that people realize in order to manufacture one of these (efficiently) we have to stick with one.
 
I think we should stick with nano tubes and not this- nanotubes have applications in space elevators and civilian armor.  This thing here is too light to do anything, and the information is not detailed enough for me.

Also, strength is done by weight/mass, which means that spider silk has more strength.  They really don't have strength for size, which worries me.
Your statement makes no sense at all. We do not have to 'stick with' one thing or another. We as a species are perfectly capable of manufacturing more than one thing at quite high efficiency.

Adaptability and specialisation are some of the few only things we as a species have going for us. Other then that, pretty apocalyptic, and humanity is really screwed. Also strength falls under hardness (scratch resistance), malleability, ductility and what-not.

forsaken1111

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
    • TTB Twitch
Re: Real-Life Cotton Candy
« Reply #103 on: December 01, 2011, 05:30:53 pm »

Shit guys, the info isn't detailed enough for RabidAnubis so we should just stop working on it. Pack the project in everyone, abandon the science!

 ::)
Logged

Loud Whispers

  • Bay Watcher
  • They said we have to aim higher, so we dug deeper.
    • View Profile
    • I APPLAUD YOU SIRRAH
Re: Real-Life Cotton Candy
« Reply #104 on: December 01, 2011, 05:35:25 pm »

Shit guys, the info isn't detailed enough for RabidAnubis so we should just stop working on it. Pack the project in everyone, abandon the science!

 ::)

We have the info... Well some of it anyways :D
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9