Woosh.
Because pointing out that that's also blatantly ignoring stuff is totally confusing.
It is not 'also' blatantly ignoring stuff. The blatant ignoring for which you originally attacked me is that same blatant ignoring. There is only one instance of blatant ignoring.
I mentioned this before. But you evidently don't like reading, so I can understand how you missed it.
You: Continue not to actual respond to my responses, instead insisiting that I am ignoring people (having previously insisted that I insisted my opinion was correct without responding to others). The hypocrisy is thick enough to build houses out of.
Because quoting your question and responding to them is totally not responding to them.
You haven't done that for the majority of my questions/statements. My first reply you responded to with an irrellevant quote. My
second reply you responded to with one response about logic, and saying you were confused. You have certainly responded to much of my previous reply, but there's nothing stopping you from also responding to the things that you, say, didn't respond to when you were 'confused'.
NUKE's being stupid. I'd ask him a question, but he'd probably just ignore it.
Why would you insult me like this. Do you really think I won't answer?
This still doesn't make any sense. Explain to me how in the offending post he's denying the existence of a serial killer.
I think only if we got literal SK in here this would make any sense.
And my case evidently does not make any sense; indeed, it is 'beyond logic'.
However, if we had a 'literal SK', it would. Therefore, we don't. I read literal SK as someone with the wincon 'kill everyone' and a NK with which to do so. Simple claims to have meant a non supernatural SK. Well,
my mistake, but it isn't such a large mistake that it invalidates my entire (or even large segments of) my case.
So what stops you from pursuing the easy obvscum some more ?
I don't need to pursue you more. Once I have proven to myself that you are a SK, and convinced others that I am correct, I don't need to pursue you any more.
Yeah unfortunately that part is true.
Great, thanks.
Let's see i was saying your explanation of me being sk was illogical not the appearance of SKs.
Lies, damned lies, and heresies. See above in my reply to Jim.
And for magical-nonmagical ratio why should i give up my baseless theory for your baseless theory ? From what information i have it's what seems more likely to me it's not something that i can get a proof of.
Yeah, yeah, fine. Keep your theory. But without evidence supporting it, not to mention evidence
detracting from it, it isn't worth anything.
You: There could be natural threats, or there could not. Seeing as we aren't sure, we shouldn't look for them.
Nope. I never said we shouldn't completely omit them just that again that theory with a imo low chance of natural killers were rather silly.
You realise that you are not contradicting what I say there.
Tch. This changes every time you mention it. A while back, you weren't even sure if he was your brother.
Where... ?
Ah... looking back, you didn't say that. Sorry. I withdraw that statement.
That's actually alright.Except the part about me lying.
...fantastic, my case is acknowledged by the suspect himself. Well, I am always in favour of going out with dignity.
Something more and claim later.
Looking forward to it.
Time Blossom: Sad to see you go. You looked like fun.
Vector: Do you agree with your predecessor's vote on me?
Cough cough.
Unvote Imik.
Hey. You are not Org. Stop pretending to be.