I'm... not so sure on Jack AT. It looks more like he's stuck in a "One of the two fighters has to be scum" mentality than bandwagon hopping at the moment. This isn't exactly a productive thing to be in, though...
Jack AT: what do you think the chances are of a) one of MBP and Janus is scum, b) both are scum or c) neither are scum?
Ignoring third parties...
A: Quite likely, I think. I see a pushy, hasty offense versus an overly emotional, angry defense. Both are rather scummy actions at this point, as far as I can tell.
B: Pretty low. As I said earlier, this feels a bit awkward for an experienced player's attempt at bussing. That could be deliberate, though.
C: Higher than B, but lower than A, in my eyes. Not sure how to explain coherently.
Janus's response to my latest vote is quite convincing, to me, in that it depended on a faulty premise: my not noting my reasons for voting for anyone at all. In fact, from what I'm reading right now, he seems to be hastily adjusting his answer in a goalpost-moving way, now saying that I wasn't using good enough reasoning for it to count. Add that to the pushiness with the amazingly weak evidence, and the Zathras point about your pushing being designed to get a strong emotional response from the guy (who, I will note, based on the games that I've read, is already a relatively emotional defender), and I've got reasons to keep my vote on Janus.
Sorry, Janus, but you're managing to lose what remained of my trust. You're not a perfect lynch, I'll give you that, but you're the best I can see at the moment (followed by MBP), and I apologize if I'm horribly, horribly wrong.