Because I apparently missed it, how do you figure lordnincompoop=warhammer suspicious? Also, as Lord pointed out, there's not much that anyone can say in their defense right now, there aren't a whole lot of tells against any one player at this point. Why do you choose Lord above anyone else? If it's because he's new you might as well call out a few other players as well, this is a BM after all.
I quoted it previous page, it was on page 4/start of day 1 (if you're using the default forum page format thing). Defending each other without evidence or reguiding votes would be a sign of scum, as the mafia would know each other and won't want each other to die, while the normal citizens would be left blind. The suspicions on him were answered by him either not noticing or not knowing.
There's not much to go on. But I'll go for with the original vote for lordnincompoop as there's just not much arguments in his defense aside from him being new. If he turns out to be innocent then it cancels out the prior suspicion on warhammer, otherwise it gives another suspect.
That's not how it works, Muz.
You have to give him a chance to defend himself, not just present some hastily thrown together accusation and then just stick with it, whatever comes.
Formulate some questions, or specify what you want him to make clear.
Also you haven reacted to Akigagaks FOS at all.
There's only weak scumtells at this point in game. Akigagak had a good FOS, but I'll go put my synopsis on it along with everyone else. A bit of suspicion on me is good too, as it keeps the mafia from killing me at night when there's a chance that the town would lynch me
Akigagak - Lurking, not liking how anti-mafia the town are (p8), though because he got a lot of votes, it's understandable how he'd be pissed
Lordnincompoop - Late to react to questions (still hasn't answered Taco Dan's) and not noticing a bunch of things. The lurker accusation doesn't count anymore because the pressure pried him from lurking.
Mindmaker - Excessively pro-town, started scumhunting from the first minute
Muz - Excessively pro-town, stubbornly sticking to the same person, even after cleared.
NativeForeigner - Haven't voted, even though he said he would.
Ottofar, Taco Dan, Trollan - Nothing outstanding (so far)
Warhammer651 - Vote deflection (page 4), pushing for a no lynch (p7)
Also, I'd say that everyone not voting is a scumtell, because the mafia would be sitting around waiting for a suspicious non-mafia who they can bandwagon on, or vote late in bandwagoning for a mafia member. I was hoping some mafia would bandwagon on lordnin at this stage of the game, but since they haven't, it increases suspicions that he might be one.
That puts some suspicions on Akigagak, NativeForeigner, Warhammer651.
Similarly, anyone who's voting without a reason is equally suspicious. But here, there's actually no reason to vote aside from drawing someone out, so even the slightest reason is reason enough.
Mindmaker, Taco Dan, and NativeForeigner are bumped down the list a bit for asking for an extension while we didn't have any leads.
Akigagak is bumped down because he could have bandwagon voted on me to improve the votes against him, instead sticking with a FOS. A mafia would also be twice as pressured by a vote on him, as it kills a mafia member and puts him out of the game; giving a double damage blow to their chances of winning. Had he been a mafia member, his pressure would have made him put a full vote on me if lordnin was a mafia, but still a weak reason if lordnin wasn't a mafia.
In light of this, I'm going to switch my vote to
Warhammer651. However, Warhammer could just be someone who believes in innocent until proven guilty, even though all the guides say otherwise.