I was just reading the regular news on a mainstream site, and the latest is that the
Journal of Feminist Geography published a study that says eating meat supports Hegemonic Patriarchy. I mean ... seriously, you don't even have to look for this stuff or make shit up, this is Poe's Law in motion.
This is the belief of a study recently published in the Journal of Feminist Geography, which argued “hegemonic masculinity implies an imperative to eat meat” and helped concrete other power hierarchies as well.
For the purpose of the research, professor Anne DeLessio-Parson spoke with vegetarians from Argentina to discover the diet itself is a political act that helps break down the gender binary.
Are you fucking shitting me? I'd like to take this movement seriously, but the ever-escalating level of
batshit crazy is why I backed off in the first place. And about 2/3rds of the meals I eat are either vegan or at most have fish in them.
The main argument seems to be that by not eating meat then the traditional male social stuff such as outdoor barbecues are eliminated, and that doing so disrupts the patriarchy. It's the same argument as calling the Superbowl the "abuse bowl" which was a big thing in the 1990s. Basically labeling anything men enjoy as being patriarchal hegemony that must be dismantled.
It's a really dumb argument. Sure, eating lentil burgers instead of beef has some
correlation with political views. However ... getting
everyone to eat lentil burgers removes that association: e.g. if it becomes the norm that conservatives also eat lentil burgers, then their politics is not going to change one bit, lentil burgers will just become co-opted by the mainstream like everything else, and then you'll have the original lentil burger eaters hand-wringing about how in their day choosing to eat a lentil burger
meant something. Vegetarianism has many ethical and health benefits, however, trying to tie
every completely unrelated issue into some "gender war" narrative is a clear wtf.