Because, quite simply, you've got nothing on me
Riiight. NOTHING on you. Absolutely nothing. Just go ahead and ignore all those posts of mine referencing you. [/sarcasm]
and I think you're only pursuing me to get the attention off yourself.
I could have sworn you had claimed I had been drawing too much attention to myself by being over-aggressive or somesuch (and thus you saying this would be a switch in argument), but looking back I can't find any posts like that.
SirBayer and Toonyman, one for lurking, the other for sidelining. Also Mr.Person and Vector.
Wow! You sure can use other people's reasons! The funny part here is that (if I recall correctly) Vector (your "also" suspicion) is the one who first said both. Actually I think M.P may have said the sidelining thing first, but I don't care enough to go back and look for something so pedantic.
Guess Zai can't be scum because he says so, that's some good evidence.
Not what I'm saying. I'm saying don't use any meta you think you have on me because it's wrong.
As Toony said later: Guess Zai can't be scum, he said he isn't!
[/quote]...Not what I'm saying. I'm saying don't use any meta you think you have on me because it's wrong. Notice the "any." That goes for town meta too, dumbass.
Get back to me when you catch up to the present instead of living in the past.
Zai would like some evidence.
I laughed.
Zai would like some evidence.
... Uh... who are you talking to, and why does "Zai" want evidence?
He's pretty clearly talking to you.
Extension until tomorrow night (I don't know how long Ed's default extension is), to give time for Josh to be a part of the game again. On Monday morning, he said he'd be back in 2 days, so he should be here sometime soon.