The metaphor I made up was for Org and IronyOwl. It looks like Org is voting Eduren and not me for some reason though and IronyOwl asked some questions so,
It is relevant, that's what a metaphor is used for, making irrelevant things relevant.
You're still not responding to any questions, including the continuation of your own ball analogy.
Hardly anyone else comes out with clear cut suspicion lists.
True, but they come out with
actual reasons why someone seems scummy. You've said
who you think is scum but not
why except in the vaguest terms. You're also not doing anything to follow up those suspicions, so it seems like your basic gameplan is "declare scum, return to lurking," without asking or answering any real questions in between.
The part where I'm picking up reasons for your scuminess after catching you is normal for me.
Wait what? When did you do
either? You've repeatedly pointed to your vote on Spartan and repeatedly ignored questions. When did you out me as scum or point out my scumminess, beyond my pressuring you and not voting Spartan?
You are scum. Give up. You're desperately throwing some sort of bitchfit attacking everyone to try to get suspicion off of you.
I'm throwing the bitchfit in a desperate attempt to get suspicion off? You've done nothing but scream and moan about how you helped lynch Spartan and I'm attacking you, therefore you're town and I'm not. Let's see your arguments for me being scum:
Way to call me out for catching scum.
IronyOwl, as you can clearly see I was the third of 4 votes on Spartan, at no point mentioned Zai (though I may have used his reasoning without remembering it was his), and with Ottofar and Eduren at 3 votes each at the same time, it is highly unlikely that anyone voting for Spartan was scum, except MAYBE Vector, but that's pure WIFOM and I will have none of it.
Therefore, I am forced to conclude you are attempting to paint me in a negative light for a combination of my general laziness leading to infrequent posting and skimming rather than reading of the thread (allowing you to later go OH WHYDJA IGNORE ME FOR THIS) in combination with my accuracy in determining your partner's identity.
I'd probably vote for Spartan if it came down to it. The issue I have here is that we know for a fact he's screwing up- this isn't some subtle anti-town ploy, this is facepalmingly bad failure. Normally, scumtells are things so incompetently bad for town that they have to be malice- but here, we're talking about incompetent malice. Discerning malicious incompetence from normal incompetence can be tricky, and I'm not sure we've got him on anything scum would want to do in that manner.
That said, we simply don't have any better targets, and he's firmly in the No Big Loss pile anyway. It just feels more like housekeeping than scumlynching.
So you'd lynch him, but you don't think he's scum?
Hey, wait, THIS WAS YOU
IronyOwl, my Wintuition said Spartan was scum and was right; it also says you are scum, and I expect it's right here as well.
The part where I'm picking up reasons for your scuminess after catching you is normal for me. You are scum. Give up. You're desperately throwing some sort of bitchfit attacking everyone to try to get suspicion off of you. Stop it. There's a difference between "IronyOwl is being aggressive" and "IronyOwl is trying to look like he's being aggressive" and wintuition says you're falling on the wrong side of the PARABOLA OF RAGE this game.
So we've got "I caught scum," "I voted earlier than I really did which means you're scum trying to shut me down," a
truly damning Day 1 post in which I
don't really think Spartan is scum, your "Wintuition," and my desperate thrashing in an attempt to avoid suspicion.
In other words, one is intuition, one is guessing wrong before the fact, and
three of your five reasons are because I'm attacking you. HMMMMM.
Now let's look at your responses to my questions:
Way to call me out for catching scum.
IronyOwl, as you can clearly see I was the third of 4 votes on Spartan, at no point mentioned Zai (though I may have used his reasoning without remembering it was his), and with Ottofar and Eduren at 3 votes each at the same time, it is highly unlikely that anyone voting for Spartan was scum, except MAYBE Vector, but that's pure WIFOM and I will have none of it.
Therefore, I am forced to conclude you are attempting to paint me in a negative light for a combination of my general laziness leading to infrequent posting and skimming rather than reading of the thread (allowing you to later go OH WHYDJA IGNORE ME FOR THIS) in combination with my accuracy in determining your partner's identity.
I told TBM and Spartan117 to prove each other to be scum.
TBM was like "No, that's stupid"
Spartan117 was like, "SURE, IF YOU STOP LOOKING AT ME."
Also, I'm basing all my statements about vote quantities based on:
<<Day 1 Lynch Tally>>
I'd probably vote for Spartan if it came down to it. The issue I have here is that we know for a fact he's screwing up- this isn't some subtle anti-town ploy, this is facepalmingly bad failure. Normally, scumtells are things so incompetently bad for town that they have to be malice- but here, we're talking about incompetent malice. Discerning malicious incompetence from normal incompetence can be tricky, and I'm not sure we've got him on anything scum would want to do in that manner.
That said, we simply don't have any better targets, and he's firmly in the No Big Loss pile anyway. It just feels more like housekeeping than scumlynching.
So you'd lynch him, but you don't think he's scum?
Hey, wait, THIS WAS YOU
IronyOwl, my Wintuition said Spartan was scum and was right; it also says you are scum, and I expect it's right here as well.
The part where I'm picking up reasons for your scuminess after catching you is normal for me. You are scum. Give up. You're desperately throwing some sort of bitchfit attacking everyone to try to get suspicion off of you. Stop it. There's a difference between "IronyOwl is being aggressive" and "IronyOwl is trying to look like he's being aggressive" and wintuition says you're falling on the wrong side of the PARABOLA OF RAGE this game.
Wait, isn't that the exact same list? No wait, there's quibbling over who caught Spartan. I wonder if having your defense and attack being the exact same thing is good at alleviating suspicions?
Pandarsenic, you've been somewhat lurky. Who do you suspect and why?
Are you trying to say, after voting him for vote-hopping, that scum would have simply vote-hopped off without consequence, and hence any previous behavior of yours is beyond reproach?
So you feel that you are both too lazy to read the thread and also just so damn good that I'm trying to point out the former to disable the latter?
You said you "found scum." You were the last vote, so you clearly didn't find him as far as anyone else was concerned. I would assume you thought to ask him that in the first place because of his reactions earlier, which means you didn't really "find" him as far as you're concerned either- is this incorrect? What are you trying to say exactly?
Except, that's not relevant to when you did it, unless you're trying to say that you voted scum and are therefore confirmed and unquestionable town. That seems to be the general argument you've been making earlier, so why are you saying that? Why can't you explain yourself on your own merits, without pointing to the end result and saying it's therefore irrelevant?
Hey, wait, THIS WAS YOU
Yes, it was. Are you going somewhere with this? Why'd you include your question but not my response?
You fought me over the votecount and who "found" Spartan, but otherwise you've had no interest whatsoever in explaining yourself beyond attacking your attacker.
Stop it. There's a difference between "IronyOwl is being aggressive" and "IronyOwl is trying to look like he's being aggressive" and wintuition says you're falling on the wrong side of the PARABOLA OF RAGE this game.
Your desperate attempts to get me off your back are noted, scum.
Author
Topic: BYOR 4 - Game Over: Cult Win (Read 112069 times)