I found that the people in graduate school who were most successful and most into Getting Shit Done had spent a couple years in industry, so I set out to imitate those people who seemed to have their heads screwed on most tightly.
I'm getting a PhD because I want to be a professor. If I did not want to be a professor, I probably would not get a PhD.
In all my time at Berkeley, this is the only guy who has treated me quite like this. I've had other people tell me I was wrong in front of the class when I was right, I've had other people question my commitment and morality, I've had folks think that I
must have taken the class before to be so much better than they were (not something they asked equally advanced male students, by the by), I've had folks ask me if I thought stuff wasn't women's work when I was doing the work in my head.
But this feels different. Okay? I've never been so obviously more talented than other students and so obviously lumped in with the folks who clearly have no idea whatsoever as to what they're doing. It's never been so clear. He doesn't have a leg to stand on, and if this were a solo event then I'd say "okay, fine, fuck you and your lack of faith but whatever." But this is a pattern.
You presented exactly one statement that could be taken any number of innocent ways and heavily implied that it was sexist. Hell yes that's illogical. More than that, it scans just like any number of overly-hysterical things that one can read on the Internet any day of the week. "Politician X wants to decrease military spending! OMG He's a terrorist-loving hippie commie traitor!"
I suppose the part where I said there was a pattern and other offenses, complete with providing examples, means nothing to you.
You might also want to look up the roots of the word "hysterical," as your arguments are beginning to be more entertaining than well-founded.