Piers Morgan had an
interview on his show with a trans author, Janet Mock, supposedly to talk about her new book. Instead of talking about the book, however, he decided it would be a better idea to start off the interview by stating that she "was born a boy," and then spend the remaining 10 minutes asking questions that would be inappropriate to ask a cis person, let alone a trans woman who is probably pretty sensitive to that topic already. Janet was a terrific sport about it through the entire interview, and although she was visibly uncomfortable, she answered the questions to the best of her ability.
People on the internet, trans and cis alike, were not so polite about it, however. They immediately called him out on it, and instead of politely apologizing like he should have, he lashed out and demanded an apology from
them, even going so far as to call Janet back for another interview, just so that he could yell over her and get upset about his perceived injustice.
The reason he thinks he shouldn't apologize is that he's a supporter of gay rights and marriage equality, because apparently, supporting gay people is the same as supporting trans people. This reasoning makes no sense because you can support marriage equality and still use 'faggot' as a pejorative term, and yet Piers seems to think that supporting gay rights means that he's free to offend both trans and gay people without persecution. It's like telling a racist joke, and then saying, "I'm not racist, I have a black friend!" except that the joke was about Asians and didn't include black people in the slightest.
Also, for those of you wondering why any of the questions were offensive, just imagine someone doing a professional interview with you on live TV and asking you about your genitals. Imagine you were born with some genital deformity that had to be corrected with surgery, and Piers just won't stop talking about said surgery and what it entailed and what your genitals looked like before and after the surgery. Wouldn't you be uncomfortable?