Knight:
I'm being called scummy by someone in a game. If I respond, I'm defensive and therefore scummy.
No. Responding is not being defensive. Attacking someone because they accuse you is defensive. Also, a major thing is your tone. That was a main thing that made me think you were being defensive.
If I don't respond I'm hiding something and therefore scummy.
Not responding does make you seem scummy, but I don't remember anything about you not responding here. The defensiveness gives the implication of having something to hide, and a townie shouldn't have to hide.
When I finally give in to demands I don't hide something and state my opinion, I'm again scummy for being defensive.
You are not scummy for saying your opinion. Its good that you came out with your suspicions. It just does not erase you being defensive earlier.
If anything you guys have gotten me to unvote on Char, as apparently, his is the game to play the first day.
Lurking is not good. Trying to lynch because he lurks is very bad.
Or is it Diablous, who has pretty much just summarized the situation the whole day. He's stayed ahead of the game and answered questions about his suspicions before people can ask them, allowing him to craft his answer on his own terms. Seems like a good play to me whether he's scum or not.
Okay? Not sure what you are trying to say here.
So Diablous, why do you think you've avoided any serious attacks so far, even from the most aggressive among us so far, Siquo.
Not sure. Maybe I haven't done anything the others find all that suspicous? As for Siquo, in the original BMX, he attacked me on day 1 and stayed on me until he was killed on night 2. He seems to play like this: He attacks someone, and if their response is scummy to them, he stays on them. Unless they make him think they are town, they are his main focus. Last game, it was me. I did not notice him attacking others that much. This game, it looks like it is Spitfire. I haven't really popped up on his radar, apparently.