Guys, we don't lynch anti-town, we lynch scum. ExKirby is providing a brilliant distraction, but I doubt on some level that he is scum. At least, right now I don't feel like there's enough proof to lynch him. If we can get him to talk a little more, find more scumtells, then let's lynch him, but I'm strongly against this lynch.
(Note: Thank you Dakarian for teaching me not to lynch people because I'm unhappy with them.)
Guys, we don't deflect and say "Hey, guys, let's not kill the current target, but I'm not going actually GO AND DIG UP SCUM MYSELF."
You're being worse than useless. Your entire post consists of defending ExKirby and saying that you want to find out he's scum by asking him questions... but no, no questions. Then you "doubt he's scum" (yes, very nice and vague) and go "Hey, there's not enough proof, so I'm not going to dig anything up."
Then you add in a nice buddying finisher.
You see, we're lynching him because he is acting incredibly scummy. I personally can't read him, so I'm going to keep lynching the person who looks like scum, acts like scum, doesn't change his behavior when asked nicely and not-so-nicely, and is illegible.
He has received more than enough chances
in this game alone.
Yeah, it's one thing to attack someone because you're unhappy with them. It's another thing to avoid lynching someone just because you're unhappy with them and want to be a
nice guy who doesn't off scum-parfaits.
Think about this: No one is going to NK ExKirby. It's about as dumb as NKing Org. Now, if ExKirby is town, do you really want to hit lylo with him and, say, Pandarsenic-scum? If we're going to lynch him, we need to lynch him early. If we're not going to lynch him, we need to be prepared to hit lylo with someone who
cannot defend himself, as town or as scum.
Meh. I know that sounds horrible, but ExKirby-Lylo is a vaguely horrible situation I'm trying to avoid, and I don't feel like protecting him just because he can't get his act together.
Now, quit being scummy and start hunting. I'm watching you.