You mangled the quotes.
Be more specific, please.
Confused? That's a scumtell btw. I showed it to you just a few posts ago.
Y'know, it'd be nice if people would READ these.
I noted several places where you have missed points. . .And, your asking would be another such! missed the giant robot roleblock, for one to pull from my wall.
Meanwhile, you're calling me out for smiles? Reaching. Simply reaching.
If I were calling two smilies an A2E, then it would be reaching. As is, it's a component of my meta-argument.
I remember being harsh to Pandarsenic in Toon Mafia 5. I was town then.
Selfmeta=null
As for the other thing.. you did that "quote without an explanation" thing again. Explain how the Emotional Apealls x4 and the quotes just before "undakarian" compare with each other.
One, you point out how lots of time and posts is a good thing, the other, you're complaining about it. Feels hypocritical.
Also explain how I am SUPPOSED to act?
Logically, with well-structured, well-researched arguments, and not appealing to emotion.
Dakarian states the number of scum differently to what everyone expects. Normally I'd let this slide, but...he has done it a few times.
I was writing this- apparently the other one is actually toonyman.
Or, Giving the scum two mislynches in one day.
WIFOM
That is in no way I can discern wifom. seriously, you're better than that with mafia terms. Another metapoint. the fact is, it was a mislynch. Another fact is, you did not do it in any particular way that made it like "another lynch". You decided on your own to go after exkirby and other people (MrPerson at least, may have been a few others) more or less said "what the hell dakarian" when you told him to claim or die.
Asking for rolenames right into RVS isn't quite the same as asking for a claim just before the person dies. It's normal to ask for a claim when the person is at L-1. Since I had a daykill, Exkirby was, effectively, at that point. It's NOT normal to start going on about roles at the very start of day 1.
See above: the town did not have the consensus you are trying to whip up out of thin air. Ergo, he was not "effectively at L-1". He was effectively at your gunpoint, whose control you were NOT really giving to the town. If you wanted to "give the town an extra lynch" you'd wait until sometime like...oh...now, and, instead of hammering, use the daykill. What you did was highly irregular and suspect.
I was moderately bothered by your rush ob. fuck, j key again.
Explain.
See above- you definitely did not have eight others with you on this.
Wouldn't it be funny if ExKirby died for no reason whatsoever?
Undakarian...
You didn't notice the big "ExKirby dies for no reason whatsover!" text soon after? That's HOW my kill worked. Write a post saying nothing but that and the person gets vigged.
I'll buy that.
I'm not the only person who thinks this cat is off.
Some webadict-highlighted hypocrisy. I'll gladly do more than spend an entire postseries defending myself!
Now I see a problem with your attack. When I remove the large quotes all I get is this to speak about. Makes it tricky to defend when you just put a quote, say "this is wrong" and walk away.
AKA: explain that one too.
You make a post saying "If you're going to attack me, do something other than spend the entire post defending yourself." -while attacking someone, the entire post, defending yourself. See yet?
Emotional appeals...to the entire town (when typically it's to individual people to defend yourself or to buddy with them)
Why appeal to one if you can garner sympathy from all? A2E is still scummy.
Your link between me and Web, which means you've created a fully decked out scumteam between him and me.
RNG's the breaks.
Me being 'undakarian'...when you haven't demonstrated what 'dakarian' is.
(town)Dakarian is actually good at this game. You're making errors left and right.
Me being hypocritical...when half of the comparisons aren't as comparable as you might think, and the other have involves reasons you don't care to explain.
A summary dismissal, does not need individual addressing, as I have addressed the points you are trying to wave off.
And a batch of other 'scummy' actions that you fail to explain.
They're your scummy actions-I shouldn't have to explain your actions. Explaining why they're scummy- that I'm doing.
(Assuming people will grasp a concept when I display only necessary steps is a failing of mine sometimes.)