Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7

Author Topic: 'Deadliest Fighter: Vikings vs. Samurai' rant  (Read 10512 times)

Neonivek

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: 'Deadliest Fighter: Vikings vs. Samurai' rant
« Reply #45 on: September 05, 2009, 03:18:12 pm »

A properly trained Knight could do one handed pushups in Armor.

Though I think the "Armor is super heavy" developed from the the fact that its weight was a serious disadvantage (Wrestling a platemailed Knight to the ground should be a lot easier then someone with ligher armor) and the fact that people who weren't trained (such as when Platemail was worn as a status symbol) could actually fall down and be incapable of getting back up.

Also as for Samurai, to my knowledge the only thing commonly armored is Helmets which knights had to train to break because it is very likely for them to actually have their weapons break on it.
« Last Edit: September 05, 2009, 03:19:55 pm by Neonivek »
Logged

Zironic

  • Bay Watcher
  • [SDRAW_KCAB]
    • View Profile
Re: 'Deadliest Fighter: Vikings vs. Samurai' rant
« Reply #46 on: September 05, 2009, 03:31:56 pm »

Here's the problem - they did it 1 on 1. If you had true numbers it'd be like 500 vikings and 4 samurai.
Logged

Phantom

  • Bay Watcher
  • Asiatic Asian
    • View Profile
Re: 'Deadliest Fighter: Vikings vs. Samurai' rant
« Reply #47 on: September 05, 2009, 03:36:28 pm »

-You also kill everyone, dammit, they even killed priests for having different religion.

How is that a bad thing? (the killing everyone part)

And they didn't kill priests for having a different religion. They killed priests because they were in the same place as the loot.
Everyone is going to hate you if you kill everyone
Logged

Cthulhu

  • Bay Watcher
  • A squid
    • View Profile
Re: 'Deadliest Fighter: Vikings vs. Samurai' rant
« Reply #48 on: September 05, 2009, 03:41:54 pm »

Yeah, but they're all dead.  Who cares what they think?
Logged
Shoes...

Phantom

  • Bay Watcher
  • Asiatic Asian
    • View Profile
Re: 'Deadliest Fighter: Vikings vs. Samurai' rant
« Reply #49 on: September 05, 2009, 03:45:41 pm »

OK, think something, if a bunch of soldiers went to your city and genocided everyone, how would you feel.
Logged

DJ

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: 'Deadliest Fighter: Vikings vs. Samurai' rant
« Reply #50 on: September 05, 2009, 03:46:58 pm »

You wouldn't feel at all.
Logged
Urist, President has immigrated to your fortress!
Urist, President mandates the Dwarven Bill of Rights.

Cue magma.
Ah, the Magma Carta...

Cthulhu

  • Bay Watcher
  • A squid
    • View Profile
Re: 'Deadliest Fighter: Vikings vs. Samurai' rant
« Reply #51 on: September 05, 2009, 03:52:34 pm »

Seriously, that's the fun of being dead.
Logged
Shoes...

Sensei

  • Bay Watcher
  • Haven't tried coffee crisps.
    • View Profile
Re: 'Deadliest Fighter: Vikings vs. Samurai' rant
« Reply #52 on: September 05, 2009, 03:59:02 pm »

When they say 'kill everyone'... they mean all of the foreigners/infidels (who were usually portrayed to the public as baby-eating demon worshipers).
Logged
Let's Play: Automation! Bay 12 Motor Company Buy the 1950 Urist Wagon for just $4500! Safety features optional.
The Bay 12 & Mates Discord Join now! Voice/text chat and play games with other Bay12'ers!
Add me on Steam: [DFC] Sensei

Vester

  • Bay Watcher
  • [T_WORD:AWE-INSPIRING:bloonk]
    • View Profile
Re: 'Deadliest Fighter: Vikings vs. Samurai' rant
« Reply #53 on: September 05, 2009, 05:03:30 pm »

Here's the problem - they did it 1 on 1. If you had true numbers it'd be like 500 vikings and 4 samurai.

All 4 of which would immediately commit seppuku rather than face the shame of fighting 500 drunk blonde guys and losing.
Logged
Quote
"Land of song," said the warrior bard, "though all the world betray thee - one sword at least thy rights shall guard; one faithful harp shall praise thee."

Neonivek

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: 'Deadliest Fighter: Vikings vs. Samurai' rant
« Reply #54 on: September 05, 2009, 05:06:13 pm »

When they say 'kill everyone'... they mean all of the foreigners/infidels (who were usually portrayed to the public as baby-eating demon worshipers).

I am pretty sure the propaganda was just as bad on the other side as well.

Bad move massacreing the People's Brigade... even if they were pillaging quite a bit.
Logged

Heron TSG

  • Bay Watcher
  • The Seal Goddess
    • View Profile
Re: 'Deadliest Fighter: Vikings vs. Samurai' rant
« Reply #55 on: September 05, 2009, 06:50:23 pm »

The point is that you think Vikings are worse fighters because they kill everyone including priests.

your logic?
Logged

Est Sularus Oth Mithas
The Artist Formerly Known as Barbarossa TSG

Neonivek

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: 'Deadliest Fighter: Vikings vs. Samurai' rant
« Reply #56 on: September 05, 2009, 07:09:35 pm »

The point is that you think Vikings are worse fighters because they kill everyone including priests.

your logic?

They don't really factor in skill as much as you would think or general health.
Logged

Phantom

  • Bay Watcher
  • Asiatic Asian
    • View Profile
Re: 'Deadliest Fighter: Vikings vs. Samurai' rant
« Reply #57 on: September 05, 2009, 07:10:00 pm »

The Populace is never on their side, which means they have more to kill.
Logged

Kagus

  • Bay Watcher
  • Olive oil. Don't you?
    • View Profile
Re: 'Deadliest Fighter: Vikings vs. Samurai' rant
« Reply #58 on: September 05, 2009, 07:10:50 pm »

Dude, don't diss my Nordic ancestral tradition of slaying religious officials.  It's a time-honored and respected part of my family.

We have of course refined ourselves over the generations...   I mean, nobody goes around stabbing bishops anymore (except uncle Lars, but he took the wrong mushrooms).  Nowadays we just slaughter their arguments.

Duke 2.0

  • Bay Watcher
  • [CONQUISTADOR:BIRD]
    • View Profile
Re: 'Deadliest Fighter: Vikings vs. Samurai' rant
« Reply #59 on: September 05, 2009, 07:12:02 pm »

The Populace is never on their side, which means they have more to kill.

 Except traders and merchants who grew wealthy off of their goods, and inland cities who grew because of their trade, and the cultural advances as their riches compelled traders to travel across many different cultures.
Logged
Buck up friendo, we're all on the level here.
I would bet money Andrew has edited things retroactively, except I can't prove anything because it was edited retroactively.
MIERDO MILLAS DE VIBORAS FURIOSAS PARA ESTRANGULARTE MUERTO
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7