Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Rysith]

Vote Rysith for lurking and not even trying to stop. Way to contribute to the discussions. Not that I'm really one to talk or anything, but it's still true. Go ahead, OMGUS, I'm fine with that. Anything to get you and me to talk more.

I'm not lurking, I'm just on vacation at the moment (and will be until Tuesday), so I don't have much time to post. I've been as active as I can be, which at this point doesn't seem to be particularly inactive. I've been trying to contribute whatever I can each time I get on to post. That said, an OMGUS wouldn't be terribly pointful now, so I won't bother.

At this point, as I said previously, I don't have any solid suspicions to go on, so I'm just trying to find my feet, as it were. I think I've made more progress trying to find people to at least vaguely trust than finding people to actively suspect. That said, I'll throw out a vote for webadict in an attempt to get him to answer my accusations of lurking.

[Cheeetar]

Alexhans, I'm extremely suspicious of you. You call out Webadict for not including me on his Random Voter list, when I had already told him he hadn't. You call out me for lurking, which I wasn't, as I was talking. (I wasn't posting much, but I wasn't lurking). You are going to push the lynch on anyone who says they don't suspect anyone.
It seems to me you're trying to get all low-posters to vote with you so they don't get voted on by you.

[webadict]

Alexhans, I'm extremely suspicious of you. You call out Webadict for not including me on his Random Voter list, when I had already told him he hadn't. You call out me for lurking, which I wasn't, as I was talking. (I wasn't posting much, but I wasn't lurking). You are going to push the lynch on anyone who says they don't suspect anyone.
It seems to me you're trying to get all low-posters to vote with you so they don't get voted on by you.

I think that's a little extreme, but I always, if you recall, wanted others to vote. If they don't vote, it is our problem. We lose valuable information that could've been used. Some of us don't have the means to do anything other than analyzing (Here's a note to you, Alexhans: It's analyze. What you're saying is fairly hilarious, though. ) Anyhow, we'd prefer it if everyone voted. It's better than not voting, because then EVERYONE can participate.

[Flintus10]

Phew* that was alot of reading.

Okay after looking over everything my vote is for inaluct. The two OMGUS votes in the first day were sucpicious as was the fact that he jumped straight onto the Twiggie bandwagon when it looked like he was done and straight off of it when it fell apart, both with little reasoning. The third OMGUS during this day hasn't helped.

Other suspicions lie with Josh but his actions, plus the possibility of a dopp bandwagon against him have left me mostly undecided on his alignment so for now inaluct.

[inaluct]

1. I haven't voted yet.

2. You're bandwagoning, which is pretty suspicious.

3. Don't you have some sort of bizarre grudge on me, or something like that? You targeted me every night you were alive in Pandar's first Ridiculous Mafia, and I seem to remember you trying to kill me some other times.

[Flintus10]

Well, I'm sort of suspicious of Chaoticjosh for the same reasons more people have already elaborated, but I'm also suspicious of webadict for still trying to push me to get lynched in favor of people like josh.

1. You don't need to vote to be suspicious of someone just for voting for you. But I did seperate that one from the others because it was not a vote.

2.How is this bandwagoning? To my knowledge only one other person has voted for you and you barely challenged it. And also aren't your suspicions for Josh based soley on you bandwagoning? (i.e "Same reasons for more people have elaborated.")

3. is a) So your third defence is based on a half-joke that Panda made weeks or more ago?  b)Nope no grudge whatsoever. 


I don't think your defense is that strong and it is increasing my suspicion that you are scum. 

[Mr.Person]

1. I haven't voted yet.

2. You're bandwagoning, which is pretty suspicious.

3. Don't you have some sort of bizarre grudge on me, or something like that? You targeted me every night you were alive in Pandar's first Ridiculous Mafia, and I seem to remember you trying to kill me some other times.

Who would you vote for? Who do you suspect? I'm thinking Inaluct and CJ, obviously, but I also think the current bandwagons on them are coming together too nicely.

Oh, unvote

[Cheeetar]

Did you just say that Inaluct was obviously suspicious of Inaluct?

[JoshuaFH]

Well, I guess I'll vote Rysith. The way he bandwagoned and then retreated when called out on it is mighty suspicious.

[Mephansteras]

The Whiteboard

chaoticjosh: A_Fey_Dwarf, Pandarsenic, R1ck
inaluct: Flintus10, webadict
R1ck: Nuke9.13
Rysith: chaoticjosh
webadict: Rysith

[A_Fey_Dwarf]

I'm back but, to be honest I expected more to happen. What happened to the activity around here?

Well, I guess I'll vote Rysith. The way he bandwagoned and then retreated when called out on it is mighty suspicious.

What?! This is exactly what you did on Twiggie. Very Hypocritical.
My vote stays on CJ.
Everyone: Who are you suspicious of? We need to lynch someone, Vote to lynch peoples. With 5 doppelgangers we have a high chance of hitting one and it is nearing a half chance all too quickly.

A_Fey_Dwarf: As you might recall from yesterday.  I agree with you... but have you any comments about the night events? about anything at all? 

The night events were pretty bland actually and didn't give much information. Obviously twiggie protected someone he trusted, and that someone twiggie trusted was either a mafia target, war vet target or exterminator target. But we don't know. There are too many options.

Meph: When does the day end and can we get a list of the living?

[Cheeetar]

I'm going to go ahead and vote Chaoticjosh. He has made no real attempt at protecting himself, despite him saying he's solely concentrated on this mafia at the cost of concentrating on others. All he seems to be doing is trying to deflect the blame onto someone else.

[NUKE9.13]

Right, well, indeed. I don't know why everything went so quiet.
May I point out that R1ck has yet to answer my questions, dropped in to bandwagon, and just generally spoke suspiciously? We have a few hours of daylight left and I would urge people to at least consider R1ck before lynching chaoticjosh.
The R1ck situation:

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

Well, I think that we can probably rule out chaoticjosh as the one that Twiggie defended, since Twiggie did vote for him yesterday.

Some time later, I return to the thread, see this, and say:

Well, I think that we can probably rule out chaoticjosh as the one that Twiggie defended, since Twiggie did vote for him yesterday.

Hmmn. Ok, but how is that useful? Why drop in to say just that? It seems like something you might say if you were a dopp/exterminator who attacked someone, only to kill twiggie instead, whilst you vainly hoped they would be protecting chaoticjosh.
-might- say. Please respond to clarify why you thought it was important.

He doesn't respond for a while, and I decide to put some more emphasis on the question by voting:

For my obligatory random vote, I'm going to vote R1ck-

Well, I think that we can probably rule out chaoticjosh as the one that Twiggie defended, since Twiggie did vote for him yesterday.

Hmmn. Ok, but how is that useful? Why drop in to say just that? It seems like something you might say if you were a dopp/exterminator who attacked someone, only to kill twiggie instead, whilst you vainly hoped they would be protecting chaoticjosh.
-might- say. Please respond to clarify why you thought it was important.

A while later, R1ck comes in, says this:

I'm going to give into the pressure to vote, and vote for Chaoticjosh. My reason is because of his voting patterns on day 1. As soon as he saw the Twiggie bandwagon starting to form, he jumped on and voted right after nuke voted for twiggie, and he also urged other people to vote for twiggie. Later, when he saw that the twiggie bandwagon was dying off, he voted for nuke, who TheToeBighter had already voted for, probably in an attempt to dispose of a strong scumhunter early in the game. After he saw that nobody else was going to vote for nuke, he switched to voting for toebighter, who was then lynched.

Huh? So, he, like, jumps the chaoticjosh bandwagon (4th/3rd on (rysith unvoted before this post)), with, admitedly, an explanation, but missed/ignored my questions. I pointed this out:

I'm going to give into the pressure to vote, and vote for Chaoticjosh. My reason is because of his voting patterns on day 1. As soon as he saw the Twiggie bandwagon starting to form, he jumped on and voted right after nuke voted for twiggie, and he also urged other people to vote for twiggie. Later, when he saw that the twiggie bandwagon was dying off, he voted for nuke, who TheToeBighter had already voted for, probably in an attempt to dispose of a strong scumhunter early in the game. After he saw that nobody else was going to vote for nuke, he switched to voting for toebighter, who was then lynched.

Ok, cool.
Now could you reply to my accusation?

To which he replied:

Your accusation that I tried to kill whoever twiggie was guarding last night? What defense can I give? I don't think there's any way to prove my innocence to you without giving valuable information to the dopps.

I quoted myself for easy reference at that point:

For my obligatory random vote, I'm going to vote R1ck-

Well, I think that we can probably rule out chaoticjosh as the one that Twiggie defended, since Twiggie did vote for him yesterday.

Hmmn. Ok, but how is that useful? Why drop in to say just that? It seems like something you might say if you were a dopp/exterminator who attacked someone, only to kill twiggie instead, whilst you vainly hoped they would be protecting chaoticjosh.
-might- say. Please respond to clarify why you thought it was important.

Which he has also ignored. Ok, he hasn't posted since. But still.
Think about it.

[Cheeetar]

I'm going to unvote for now so I can see both Chaoticjosh and R1cks defense of theirselves. If neither of them post, I'll vote for Chaoticjosh, as he specifically said he was very concentrated on this mafia.

[Alexhans]

Hi guys... I've abused IRC mafia and completely forgot about mafia forums so I will catch up and post soon...

MOD:  Just in case, when is the deadline