All right, I'm just gonna say we vote for FallacyofUrist today, as the player who seems most likely to be hostile out of everyone.
FoU's traditionally pretty Max-hostile for sure. And weirdly hasn't posted for more than a day. Found out I was WW, lock'n'load perhaps. Oh well either way.
I was just speccin' on 'yes'. I'd be willing to vote it another day if I don't actually want to elim someone, but I don't care if it's ever voted, this 'yes' is not part of my role that I know of.
I don't really want us to lock someone down tonight, though I'm willing to be flexible about that, convince me or others if you have a preference for whomever. For now,
No Elimination is fine by me.
I kinda hope the CM vs undead thing resolves soon, be that a win or a death or whatever it takes, whoever it takes.
If CM is still a living player D1 I will probably be pretty open to a vote there, but that's spec on not knowing who all is alive and what else has happened and I can be flexible on that. An in-play undead hunter that hasn't won or died before too long is a bit inconvenient for my helpful but monstrous plans.
I need wounds to fix if I'm not going the undead status route or really risking my win on random chance. Call me an 'ambulance chaser' if you wish; one of my ways to win is just to fix a wound on everyone else; it's my most certain way to win, if only everyone else could get a wound; as is, I can fix one per night. But Verm's the only wound-maker I know is in play so I'm quite fine with Verm doing his thing based on claims. Please do inform if you're wounded, I'd love a chance to fix - and my fix for wounds does not create an undead status.
I mean, Verm could be 'evil' but it's a kinda evil I like and I'm glad to clean up after him.
Umm, Verm, if my fix for wounds actually is an unspoken problem for you; deal with the undead hunter presuming you can and choose to, and I can use other tools to chase my wincon.
Why is Fal~ the one to go
Well, no-one's going anywhere, remember? If this were an ordinary lynch I'd be a bit more circumspect about it, but we're just choosing who to put on ice for now.
And if you want to visit me before I leave and Imp doesn't want me to leave until you have, then making me uninteractable for the night doesn't play to any of our benefits.
Yeah, I was thinking about that.
If Max wins on a 'yes' so leaves end of D0 which is claimed would take out Tric and Verm start of N0, because win/loss condition is checked start of each phase.
If the removal of those three removes all currently existing undead status players (I'm genuinely not one) then maybe we remove CM start of N0 too, because on a win/loss then everyone left has their win/loss checked then.
And that's just the
claims, but a lot may happen fast, I dunno. It changes how I play, I sure hope everyone BUT me can't win D0/N0. I can lose before D1 but the soonest I think I can win is D1, unless our mod was very merciful.
I don't know that 'yes' means 'let Max win now'. It could mean 'I agree to instalose' or 'I would like a nice reward' or 'let's unlock someone's locked ability' or anything else.
But if 'yes' means 'let Max win now' I'd be glad to see Max win without loads of people instalosing because of that. If enough people are instawon/lost through that, I will instalose too by means of being the last one in play, which is a loss condition for me.
So I'd like to confirm with Max that I'm cool with voting yes later, even if I want someone dead (course if I'm dead I can't vote) and generally I wanna not mess Max up any more than I want to mess anyone up, which is not at all... it
may be hard for me to play super nice with undead hunters (or not, depends on how the game goes) and I want CM resolved soonish if possible through any resolution path we find.
Author
Topic: Bring Your Own Alignment - Game Over (Read 8702 times)