Pretty sure Max’s last game was Bastard.
Yo, Max is this game Bastard?
What makes a game Bastard? (Lust for gold? Power? Or were you just born with a heart full of bastardry?)
I don't consider it to be. You win by killing scum and not killing town, for certain valid definitions of same. You're voting to lynch somebody, not to give away free doughnuts. In other words, the structure is that of an ordinary mafia game. But that doesn't mean I can't have some tricks, either.
My desperate hope is that we're in a not-not-not-not-not-quite bastard game.
If not this one, some other, some time. I wanna see a lot of Max's tricks, I now know this (last game I was confused by other things).
This won’t help us find scum Imp.
Statistically speaking we won’t eliminate scum D1, and that’s borne out in my experience.
I am saying if there is a vig, you are a good choice for shooting. We cannot choke the day with discussion about this, please, for the love of all that is good. My position is clear. I don’t care about you beyond it being good strategy to shoot a survivor.
Please stop.
Stop the flip what? I'm playing. So are you. I'm not trying to kill anyone's fun, but let's suppose this:
7 players
1 survivor
4 town
2 scum
Let's say we elim 1
town D1.
Let's say survivor is shot N1.
Now, we have a D2:
3 town, 2 scum. Game continues, town could lose.
Different event:
Let's say we elim
town D1.
N1 another
town is shot.
1 survivor
2 town
2 scum
And you can freak but at least town tried to win, and might still. Because this is the path to a town win:
N2 a scum is shot.
1 survivor
3 town
1 scum
If I'm honest about my survivor claim than killing me, instead of someone who could be anti-town, is not optimal for town.
Town needs anti-town dead. Town does not need me dead, and town killing me to try and keep numbers of non-town low is a town trying to lose. Town needs to kill enemies of town. I am not that.
Elim, vig, whatever, they're kills. Kill the people your wincon need dead, or try your best.
What's wrong with my thinking, Hector?