Fallacy:
anti-anti-webaddicts are, presumably, the enemies of anti-webaddicts.
Are they even real nya? Anti-anti webadicts? No, let's not discount the possibility until proven otherwise. So far we've only heard of them from Toony - not exactly the most reliable source. But even unreliable sources can provide information.
My PM mentions Anti-Anti-Webadicts, so I certainly believe they exist.
Y'all don't hammer before the Webadict, in a game called Kill Webadict Now, gets a chance to say anything, okay?
Are you Pro-Webadict too nya? Webadict must die. Knightwing is not incentivized to tell us anything useful at all.
But you know, leaving time for people to talk before a hammer makes sense, yes. The hammer is pretty large, though, so it shouldn't be an issue.
A D1 quickhammer is rarely pro-town.
Toonyman:
From above, a spirit made of glistening reds, oranges, and yellows soars above you, clustering before exploding into light. A great echo cry of a bird, far away, rings in the environment. She calls for you.
Are you a phoenix? Wasn't there one in Magic Mafia?
Maximum:
You know, it just occurred to me that that blue text was a lie.
The blue text that is explicitly called out as always true?
Egan:
I think it's a given that all players other than Knightwing need Knightwing to die in order to win. That was in blue at the start of the game.
...Hypothesis: There is no such thing as pro-webaddict, other than maybe the webaddict themself and maybe references to it in roles. The real factions are anti-webaddict and anti-antis, both of which need the webaddict to die.
Possibly, but I'm 99% sure that there was Pro-Webadict in one of the prior KWNs.
I imagine/hope Knightwing is typing something out and just knocking out something quick to acknowledge his presense?