Almost certainly the other player, because I was dead-set on your being scum last time as a claimed mason. Without further evidence, I'm going to lean towards shooting the other one.
Isn't this a cognitive bias? Just because you misjudged me as scum when I had a strong case for being town, doesn't mean that you should judge me as town when I don't have that circumstance. In fact, shouldn't it make me more suspicious that I don't have a strong case for being town right now?
So, you obviously don't have a strong case for being town right now, because we're RVSing and you haven't yet claimed as a mason. Under the circumstances, your question is moot, and I know it, and you know it, &c. It's an intellectual exercise.
As an intellectual exercise: I learned last game that even with very strong reasons to think you should be town, my gut may misread you as scum. We have played all of one game together. I don't have a similar piece of information about any other player in the game (except NQT, who I have a strong bias to read as town even when he isn't). Under those circumstances, which to me basically gives "person I can't read vs. person I can't read," I might as well shoot the other one to change things up a bit.
I mean, if you want my
real answer? I'd go back and reread the thread until I had more information on you, the other guy, and the person who started the thunderdome. It depends on what Day it is. It depends on who else is dead and how much information each kill would provide, blah blah blah blah blah for me it's more about context than about any one person involved and without that context the question doesn't give viable information about my ge-new-eye-N thought process.
But you know that.
So, you're looking like an awesome D1 lynch target, because you've managed to make it clear that you have no interest in furthering town goals. Maybe knock it off. If you actually are a survivor and you want to win with town, you need to help us find us some scum today. Otherwise, let's just say that you're the default.