This is only half of what I planned on posting, but I have to be somewhere, so I may as well post this and do the rest later.
doll:I think one of your kill targets should be OSG. He's an unknown quality at this point, and we have no idea when he'll get replaced, plus he's revivable if he's town or town-aligned.
Besides placing themselves at the top and me in some netherworld abyss, does anyone strongly disagree with this?
In particular, does anyone still have a problem with Tea, or any of the other players in the Black&Bold section?
I'd make some rearrangements to the list, like Lenglon, I'd move TDS up the list a bit, but that's the only major change.
Pozzai:You're lumping people in the game into an indistinguishable "they" in this post and its really weird, since I don't think you're using it as a gender neutral pronoun here.
I use "they" a lot, because it's the gender neutral way of speaking of people. As long as I'm not 100% certain of people's gender, I tend to keep it gender neutral, which I have done the entire game, except one instance where I think Tea initially said "he" so I in terms responded with "he" about Lenglon, how come you haven't noticed that other places?
I have noticed it. In fact, I specifically mentioned that this was really weird because you
were not using it as a gender neutral pronoun in my post (the bolded section). Reread your post again, and you'll notice that you use they in response to doll's question about other players, which creates the impression of "the other players are out to get me" when most of the actions you were referring to were solely by TBF. But you don't refer to any player by name, so the usage of "they" instead distances the other players and turns them into this anonymous force that's attacking you.
You're verbally supporting a case on me, that I, and even Doll themself agreed on was "weak"
It's a kind of non-commital way to keep pressure on a person, while deciding whether you want to be on the wagon and actively pursuing the lynch, or stepping back later if things change. The fact that you're now trying to make it sound as if you were not actually scumreading me, makes the manner of reminding people of the case even worse.
I'm making it sound as if wasn't actually scumreading you, because I wasn't. I found elements of your play suspicious, and so I poked at them and tried to get you to post your reads, but I didn't see you as scum. If I thought you were scum, I'd have voted you or given you the blue finger of suspicion.
Tea:Way more people are focusing on these things than would be non-town in a standard game.
Are the people non-town, or are the things non-town? Can you explain your first sentence quoted a bit more?
I expanded upon it starting in the 3rd paragraph of this post. I think in general spending lots of time asking things that are unlikely to yield alignment indicative info is active lurking/more trying to look helpful than anything and thus a scumtell. But that behavior IMO was prevalent to the point that it was clearly to some extent a feature of site meta more than something that useful to look at as an individual tell.
Thanks for clearing this up, it was your grammar usage that confused me here.
What's wrong with thinking long term? Why would FofU be expecting to die soon? More importantly, why does that make him scum as opposed to unprepared town? I understand you're suspicious of him for more reasons than that, but you put this one first, which implies its the most important.
"Underprepared" sounds like it could have a more coded meaning than I'm aware of, but from what I can tell I think not prioritizing getting reads and thus being underprepared is a scumtell, so.
I meant unprepared in terms of not planning on dying that night. But I understand where your coming from now. I need to read back through Fallacy's posts, because he's been bugging me a little, so I'll look for that when I do.
hector13:Fair enough. Much better post, though lol at only spending an hour on a WoT
Still a bit iffy about you bringing up the hammers, 'cause it was D1 and as Tolyk pointed out, 9 voted are required to hammer at this point. Seems like an awful lot of votes to be worried about.
Man, editing this WoT down was annoying. Also I definitely spent more than an hour writing two of my giant posts this game.
My thought process was basically "There are three votes are Tea, I wonder if there are hammers? Oh there are, I should remind people that there are."
So you voted FoU in this post, do you plan on lynching him on day end
If yo