I got nothing to add to the carrier group debate except to say that if we're literally fielding one Z carrier for 100 Wasp Nests, that Z carrier had better be the goddamn
USS Enterprise (the Federation starship, not the WWII carrier).
Also there is no reason not to push in two areas rather then one, we literally lose nothing.
actually, when both sides attack in one place, one side WILL gain territory. SO if we are confident we could repel an attack but are not confident we could win on the offensive, the right move might be to not attack and let them crash on defenses.
Note, this applies when fighting for the same territory. When fights happen at the border, this doesn't seem to apply: see when they invaded mountains while we invaded southern tundra: nobody gained land that turn.
This is one of the things I'm still confused about, as Sensei has explicitly said that choosing to attack in an area does not mean you will defend less effectively there. But it seems intuitive that if both sides are evenly matched with defence outstripping offence, then both sides choosing to attack simultaneously must cause one side to win and thus disprove what he said.
Anyway, if you're referring to the Jungle, we are at the border there already. So we could opt to attack into North Cannala without fear, albeit that this would likely fail as we don't have landers.
(5) aT-J04: Azzuro,Piratejoe, Powder Miner, Taricus, Wolfhunter107
(2) UF-AC-40 'Khopesh': Light forger, Funk
(7) UFS-CV-40b 'Sea Lift' Pattern A: evictedSaint, Happerry, Kashyyk, Madman198237, NUKE9.13, Andrea, GUNINANRUNIN
(2) Compact Death Ray: Olith McHuman , 10ebbor10, Stabby
(1) Archer pattern k: NAV
(2) Design doctrine: Slat armour: NAV, Taricus
(2) Design doctrine: Tactical rails: NAV, Taricus
(1) Design doctrine: WING FENCES! : Azzuro
(6) Name the northern island "Tereshkova": Khan Boyzitbig, evictedSaint, NAV, Piratejoe, Taricus, Azzuro
(1) Convert remaining SPATs into civilian farming tractors and bulldozers: NAV