Tiruin: I'm also confused about this. You seem to think webadict is scum for role-related reasons but you're not suggestion-voting and you're leaving the case to other people?
Of course after I poke you about your movements and mannerisms...this feels like you're rather eager to lynch but also
rather cautious with it.
I never said WEBADICT WAS MAFIA LEANING IN MY MIND
This is more 'MAKING MY THOUGHTS PUBLICIZED' rather than anything because of the newbies, more are #d than scum and I cannot see them linked together in their mannerisms.
Apparently this has generated a nice reaction from others as well, so it's working quite!
Is that all you can seriously give after the long downtime and the judgement call of the masses? You shifting your 'Kingly suspicion' to the latest posters without context?
This seems either like a pressure bop, or someone missing context.
I feel like quoting my feelings in a
Les Misérables here, but I'm rather curious about your latest post.
So this is my plan: We'll enter the lynch phase at roughly the same time of day as last time this next Monday. If there isn't a clear consensus or if people don't have any serious votes, I'll make the decision on who is up for lynching.
We've had a rather 'serious' vote; you did
not give your thoughts about it.
I'm going to vote no because I don't see a good case to lynch TBF over.
FoU: How close does that bring us to a "no" hammer?
So says the King.
And then this was your lastest last post (other than the clarify boop to those 'voting TBF' which nobody noticed I unvoted because I spelled "unvoting")