That said, it's quite telling seeing rags like Salon (who incidentally quickly deleted some of their more infamous 'pro-paedophilia' articles before putting up their one on Milo), or people who've constantly defended Roman Polanski in the past, suddenly wheel out the full-bores just for Milo.
Tbh pedo rags fightan pedos is commendable. Sympathy for victims does not excuse how the dude is dodge and influential in the Trump right; interesting to see how the Americans will respond. Hopefully prog rags remain anti-pedo and gops don't slacken just because this "one dude is super important on twitter." Perhaps in time, they will no longer even been known as pedo rags
I hate to do this for two reasons, but technically it would be hebephilia: attraction to pubescent but immature individuals is different from pedophilia: attraction to pre-pubescent individuals.
Now why do I hate to do this?
1. I don't want to defend Milo, honestly it's hilarious seeing him get shitcanned for it, and it's such a juicy counterpoint to the "SJWs want to prevent people from saying certain things, therefore liberals hate free speech" when they can now point to CPAC and Breitbart and his publisher as shining pillars of something or other.
2. Shouting the loudest most offensive thing you can, even if completely inappropriate, literally got Trump elected. So while it is technically incorrect to call Bannon a nazi--though Richard "Punchable as Hell" Spencer is one and a big fan of his--it's less likely to confuse anyone, and probably will get more of a reaction than calling him a neofascist pseudo-intellectual cuntbag would. It's technically incorrect to call Milo a pedo, but explaining why isn't going to do much besides let you know that, yes, while the other guys kept doing this and won, you made sure your usage was correct.
Fuck it, trying to be polite and claim some sort of high ground against a bunch of shitflingers didn't work, it hasn't worked before, it doesn't show signs of ever working.
If Donald wants to be a douchebag and fling around words incorrectly and butcher everything he says to win over his audience, trying to stop him isn't going to work, but using the same methods to fuck over his efforts seems like fair game to me when you've got this fucker trying to run around dismantling shit because he doesn't understand it. We let him keep that up and it'll be Trump sitting on a pile of rubble because he didn't understand anything of significance and just kept kicking at pillars and pushing buttons until it was all ruined.
On the topic of metric vs imperial:
While metric is best for sciencey things, Imperial is often better for day to day stuff. For example Fahrenheit is great for normal uses because 0 to 100 is roughly a good range for human livability, but 0 and 100 in Celsius is a huge range where 0 is still cold as funk but 100 is now you are dead.
That's completely moot if you're used to metric though. Farenheight makes no sense to me, while I intrinsically know that -20*C is not good unless winter, -10*C is tolerable, 0*C is ok, 10*C is best, 20*C is tolerable, 30*C is wrong, 40*C is mosquitoes and death
Until I noticed it and wondered why the hell it isn't pointed out more often, I had trouble getting my hooks into Celsius.
0 C = 32 F
10 C = 50 F
20 C = 68 F
30 C = 86 F
40 C = 104 F
50 C = What the fuck why do you live there, jesus how are you even alive, seriously I was born shortly after Dallas, Texas hit 113 F and that record has stood for 36 years, 122 F? Fuck that!