he'll see us try to be reasonable and Kingly.
Why would we want this? We're a military king behind the reigns of the most military ready Luathbas there's ever been. Honestly every action we spend diplomizing instead of warring is a wasted action. We should go to war, right now, land grab as much as we can, force a peace on them, and then when we get a diplomatic king he can spend his reign stabilizing relationships.
It's not like everyone knows our traits
It's more like 'ohey this guy is good at this', that they've a
reputation instead. I mean, our first tactician King was NOT having a title relevant to War, it was to defense and protection.
So...it's not as rigid as the trait and dice mechanics are. And we're NOT about to anger a large Republic who we only have heard of their power from reports months ago (and who conquered our grumpy enemy from the South). Checking that map--they are HUGE. We lack the manpower in an ensuing war UNLESS we can collect more information about them :I
That, and we got our army designs from studying them so >_> I sense a tech advantage on their part, and stupidity on ours. Just because the leader is awesome and powerful does not necessarily mean the country can maintain that advantage if its people are outnumbered in force; there are many aspects to war and order, and we should REALLY note that the Population value has been steady and rising lately--I do not want to see it fall. (I see it as something significant...and worth mentioning, so I connected it to 'big army wars')
Also unless you've got added info (please share if so :3), the King Traits are random.
...I just realized we lost a Lucky, Enduring, and Martial King to a Northern Clan/Tribe(?) Leader ._.; Goodness it was a good decision to give them living space in our Kingdom. Maintain more relations with those dudes please!