My oh my, the condescension really comes quite naturally to some of you guys.
You must have reasons. I thought I'd help you with some vague ones if you hadn't. Inbetween that point in the thread and this all I've learnt is that you've swallowed Trump's bile (despite not liking him) and subscribed to (highly selective) tinpot tales told about the past rather than have any actual theories about what the future will be like.
I do have theories about what the future will be like, but I really didn't like the implications you were heaving and couldn't be bothered refuting them. If you must know what my "theory" is, then here it is. Clinton will lead to an ever-downward spiral of corruption and decay, eventually resulting in a civil war that severely weakens the US, potentially allowing Russia or China to take the dominant position in terms of influence on the world. Highly simplified.
That's at least an explanation, though when you stack it up against the business temperament of her opposition, I say it's misguided. "Implications" are in your mind, I just plucked two entirely different scenarios out as an example to prompt you to tell us
your scenario, and you didn't get the hint until now. Sorry. I'll be clearer next time.
Anyway, I need to sleep. Goodnight.
West Coast US is 8am, by my reckoning, 11am on the East. 5am in Hawaii. Yeah, I've done my fair share of that. Doesn't always help the thinking process. Re-read this all 'tomorrow', when you awake, is my advice.
(ETA: Yes, I didn't want to 'implicate' anything, but I was actually guessing Western Pacific. Japan's just passed midnight. Didn't bother to check the profile, just thought that if I gave a plausible out and left it at that it might resolve itself without any undue embarassment, but now it's in the open...)
(ETA2: and when you get to the reply about the above (you'll know it when you see it) you should know that I'm also in the (dis)UK contingent.)