There is a point there, that someone who was president for 8 years may be more constrained in what he can say than other people.
Maybe? It's not like clinton doesn't have a significantly longer and generally higher profile political career, though. That sort of constraint (to the extent it exists) isn't exactly exclusive to the position of POTUS.
Eh I've never been able to do that.Like I consider it kinda morally wrong of i flat out didn't listen to somebody becuase of their appearance or the way the way they sound.
... see again, what was written. You may have something of a moral burden to communicate or try to understand folks but that don't mean you're mandated to watch or listen to the buggers. Particularly if you know it's something that's going to influence how you interpret what they're saying (And I could see how it would in the case linked, as the guy
looks like a jackass, and like or not that does predisposition folks in how they process stuff), seeking another medium to go about things is the
more moral choice. You're trying to filter out identified bias factors, and there ain't no vice in that.
Is this just campaign lies or things she's said during debates or is it all of the lies and things that we know about?
Couldn't say. Can you actually point to
particular lies that's causing you to feel this way? Or is it the whole "well, they say she's untrustworthy so she's untrustworthy" thing going on?