Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[TempAcc]

Well, you know, those bill clinton accusations actualy had names attached to it, soooo :u

[Playergamer]

Exactly!

What a sad and pathetic display of subject changing.

You accused a possible child rape victim of lying because she didn't want to expose her name to people like... well you.

Thank you, I'm flattered.

Anyway, my point is simple: It's awfully hypocritical of you people to sweep accusations against Bill under the rug, and then treat an anonymous filing of a lawsuit as "ohmygerd RAPIST."

Now, you can get the hell off your high-horse, mainiac.

[Rolan7]

You accused a possible child rape victim of lying because she didn't want to expose her name to people like... well you.  The advocates of these people walk over eggshells to be as even handed as possible and you immediately leap to blame anyway.

...What?  Playergamer said no such thing, and you instantly got incredibly personal.  Take a look at the topic title and chill, jeez.

[TempAcc]

Mainiac, dude, remember that thing with RK? The reason you were specifically mentioned in the OP, ye?

[mainiac]

Anyway, my point is simple: It's awfully hypocritical of you people to sweep accusations against Bill under the rug, and then treat an anonymous filing of a lawsuit as "ohmygerd RAPIST."

Now, you can get the hell off your high-horse, mainiac.

You are inventing strawmen that dont exist.  The article was careful to say that they were a matter for investigation.  You know investigations?  That process where you go out to find the truth?

You get off your high horse.  You said horrible things and are now trying to blame me for what you said.

[Sheb]

Like the investigations of Hillary? 

More seriously, I'm not sure what the media is supposed to investigate here if they don't even have the name of the victims.

[mainiac]

Like the investigations of Hillary? 

Have I ever once said that there should be no investigation?

Seriously.  There is a real fucking problem here.  People are jumping straight to their prejudices in place of actual investigation.  There was an investigation of Hillary Clinton.  I wish that people would look at the actual results of that investigation instead of using "where there is smoke there is fire". When I did that people ridiculed me.

I'm not sure what the media is supposed to investigate here if they don't even have the name of the victims.

Generally these people are repeat offenders.  Look at the recent events with Roger Ailes.

[Playergamer]

Or Bill Clinton!

[mainiac]

Or Bill Clinton!

And they investigated him.

Look this concept is pretty simple.  People that have been investigated and found not guilty should be treated as not guilty.  Accusations should be treated appropriately.  Saying that Trump should be assumed innocent because the Clintons were investigated and found not guilty is completely illogical.  And it distracts from a huge problem, when a possible child rape victim came forward you leapt to smear her character in truly vile fashion.

[Wolfhunter107]

Exactly!

What a sad and pathetic display of subject changing.

You accused a possible child rape victim of lying because she didn't want to expose her name to people like... well you.

Thank you, I'm flattered.

Anyway, my point is simple: It's awfully hypocritical of you people to sweep accusations against Bill under the rug, and then treat an anonymous filing of a lawsuit as "ohmygerd RAPIST."

Now, you can get the hell off your high-horse, mainiac.

And his point is that you're being an asshole for doing the old "attack anyone who criticizes Trump" routine, and then trying to change the subject the moment you realized that you couldn't win the argument that you just started.

[mainiac]

Well there's also that but I'm most worried about the fact that people think it's okay to blame people claiming to be rape victims before there was even an investigation.  That's vile.

[Playergamer]

I didn't "blame" anyone, mainiac. Find a place where I "blamed" this person, please. Then we can talk.

[martinuzz]

Also, WTF with the five-years statute of limitation? I mean, I'm all for statute of limitation, but you should at least give the time to your child rape survivor to grow to adulthood before they sue.

Damn, indeed. That 5 year term can only have been instated by childmolestors to protect child molestors.

[MarcAFK]

If there's any crime that shouldn't have time limits on prosecution that would be one. But sure lets go straight to victim bashing whenever it's a famous person who's accused, why not.
Hitler I mean Cosbydidnothingwrong.txt

[Sheb]

Yeah, I don't think doubting the veracity of the accusation is the same as blaming the victim or something. The timing seems suspect to me too. Sure it should be investigated (And I guess the judge's on the case), but in the meantime, on is allowed to be skeptical.