For my part, sounds consistant.
Ok, my thoughts ('scuse me, but I'm away from my notes at home, butbfrom memory):
Moonlit volunteered having the Watching ability (upon Hector, seeing Fallacy?), N1,before any reason to do so other than actuality. Moreover, it effectively gets confirmed by Fallacy. (The ability to gain that knowledge, not the intent, but I can't find a better spin to put on it than take it at face value.)
Fallacy could be lying about the Tracking (possibility that it was something else, especially with Hector's demise). And I still don't like the no-evidence anti-Fish stance.
Fish claims things for N1 I consider to be very wrong. Meanwhile nobody claimed to have visited Fish, and I detected nobody doing so. If my skills are to be believed (e.g. I have not been Hectored into targetting myself, unwittingly) I must further believe Moonlit in this regard, and doubt Fish's misdirection (own, or courtesy of another).
N2, nobody died. Either no intent/ability to repeat Hector's fate on another, or now Hectored to (non-fatally) self-target? Right now, one of my guesses is that my Protection From Visits upon Fish did not stop Hector's skill (as per description) landing on either killer-Fish or the true killer. But that's risky to assume, and it is tricker for anyone but dead Hector or the possibly-afflicted killer to know for sure.
I'm still withholding who I (think I, assuming not Hectored) protected last night, because I think I can help Town more by doing so.
Umm, ninjaed by Moonlit overturning my assumption that it was Watching Hector. But posting anyway. Analysing later.