Why did you change the topic from the media lying?
The topic isn't 'the media' lying, the topic is whether a silent majority is sufficiently anti-immigrant that burning down refugee homes and killing people in the process can be seen as a legitimate - since alternativlos - form of resistance. So far, you have provided exactly jack shit evidence. Go sit in the shame corner with Morrigi.
The Swedish Democrats make up 20% of their country's votes and their whole platform is anti-immigration. No one is speaking up for them, though, because they are silent. How many more people are there out there who believe in their policies?
How is this relevant for the situation in Germany? A large majority of Saudis are in favor of Sharia law. Should that fact enter the discussion on how Germany should treat its Salafists?
I have a sneaking suspicion you'd dismiss any evidence of support that people could show, just as you'd dismiss evidence showing that migrants heavily support terror attacks and very "extremist" beliefs.
And lo and behold, to the surprise of precisely no-one you use that accusation as an excuse to provide none at all. Hell, I even gave you a criterion for what I'd consider evidence: Get me poll data. Good, German poll data. I've certainly done the same for you, haven't I? The thing is: It doesn't exactly support your crude worldview...
Any politically active ilk of Pegida have been marginalized and attacked though. Consider our analogue Mosley, who said that current rates of immigration would make the natives strangers in their own country - despite having 3/4 of the country agreeing with him, he was dismissed from the cabinet. Even today you can see things where UKIP become the 3rd largest party yet win only 1 seat whilst the leftists with far less support retain disproportionately vast amounts of power, or more strikingly where Front Nationale won 1/3rd of the national vote and won not a single region. Then there's that issue where all the party leaders of all the mainstream parties come from the same elite Unis like Oxford, Cambridge, ENA, so you have that quandary where you can vote for a left-wing pro immigration pro-EU party or a right-wing pro immigration pro-EU party.
You're just describing the issues with the strange English voting system... Germany has an MMP system, which prevents these issues. Back in 2013 the AfD would almost have entered parliament, but failed to meet the 5% threshold. If the election was held now, it would get about 10% of seats - and thus 10% of the parliamentary power. The thing is: The AfD is hardly being discriminated against via voting mechanisms - but still they're only at 10% in the polls, and that's pretty much the high-water mark. They're simply a relatively small vocal minority, much like Die Linke.