Yes, yes, they're not ˾literally identical practices. ̚ Just close enough in sentiment and execution the parallels are more than a little obvious. And I guess, being fair, the US hasn't actually gone through with a blanket ban against a religious/ethnic group! Yet.
It's still morbidly amusing to see a country with large swaths of the population calling for exactly what kuwait is doing making a fuss about it. Hell, if the polls are even remotely resembling representative there's more people in the US that's professing support for that kind of behavior than kuwait has people, period.
Mind, m'not exactly saying kuwait shouldn't be shit on from on high for the practice, but still. S'maybe just a wee bit of hypocrisy going on.
A country isn't calling for anything. :V
There's Donald Trump, with some supporters. He holds no office, has no power, and won't become President.
Because there's no stateside call for the complete extermination of muslims and Israel has no history of aggression and/or terrorist acts, of course
1) The states would not actually do that. If they tried it, they would be very quickly get out of power by the hands of federal forces.
2) Israel has a long history of living alongside people who openly call for murdering every single jew and have been constantly attempting to make that a reality by bombarding them with terroristic missile strikes and sending in madmen with knifes to randomly kill anyone they see, while simultaneously being subject to lingering anti-semitism sentiments from the world (as can be seen in the sheer amount of UN's anti-Israel resolutions). Their "aggression" and "terrorist acts" are perfectly justified.
1. You've misunderstood the meaning of the word "stateside." It means "in the United States of America," and has nothing to do with individual states.
2. Israel seems to think that retaliating with far more force and precision than they were attacked by, killing innocents, destroying schools and hospitals, etc, will somehow cow the Palestinians instead of enrage them.
Good to see so many of you are one trumped up news article away from supporting genocide
They're just parroting the politicians and pundits in the US who say that we should never have invaded Iraq the second time, because ISIS wouldn't have arisen if we had just left Saddam in place (since it came from AQI which was started there after the invasion because Saddam kept AQ out).
How does it advocate genocide?
Not eliminating Saddam. See his history.