Anyway, any narrative of me being the killer must deal with one thing: my claims in thread today. Sorry to drag you into WIFOM, but it has to be dealt with: Why would killer me claim both the redirect or randomize and the action failure? Why not just the latter, explaining the failure without connecting me to the dead?
Your question: "Assume I'm killer, why would I claim both action-redirect/randomize and failure?"
Well. In my opinion, a killer wouldn't be likely to do that. But a townie, wanting to give information to his fellows, might. On the other hand, a failure is a suspicious thing: you might have never had that ability in the first place(could be scum pretending to have the ability but saying it failed to cover up the lack of ability). If you, as the killer, claim you were redirected... that connects you to Persus.
You're right, you just WIFOMed me. This is hard to think through.
Answer: if you're the killer, claiming you were redirected to Persus creates a low-tier(mini) refuge in audacity. Why would a villain tell you he targeted the person who died? If you're town, you also would want to claim your redirect to give the town information and to act as a semi-alibi. In short... in my opinion, for the moment,
both town and scum would want to claim the redirection(fake or not). A less experienced player might not have tried that if scum, however. Since you're very experienced, that doesn't help me. Hm hm hm.
Fallacy Despite the doubt cast on you during day 1, what is your outlook beginning on day 2?
TheLoneStar Who do you find second-most suspicious, and why?
Oh come on, his username is TheDarkStar, not TheLoneStar! On a more serious note, my outlook is good- we still have a rather large buffer of people in the way of the scum(more time to find them) and I intend to find the traitors in our midst, to the best of my ability.