(( 0) The focus on NQT))
1) Threatening people to do your bidding and agree with you.
2) Instead of coming up with ideas on your own you appeal to authority.
3) Not having any suspects (once you stopped focusing on NQT), viewing everyone as town. Being wishy-washy about hunting anyone else.
Even though you're "dropping your case" against me, I'm going to go ahead and and answer these concerns.
1. Threatening you say? My words were-something like this: "if you want NQT to not be lynched you had better give good reasoning or you will be suspicious to me". I think. So let's give an example. Urist McMafioso says "no, I don't want to lynch NQT because he's obviously town". Would that not earn your suspicion? If someone gives a reason, say: "no, I don't want to lynch NQT because his WIFOM bomb sparked a lot of conversation", that's justifiable.
2. Appeal to authority. Game two, man. I don't have enough experience to generate dense, filled-out cases on my own- though I have to say I'm trying, and learning. Besides, examining what others say provides me with good clues/thoughts/words to build my own arsenal for when I go on the attack.
3. No suspects. No obvious ones, anyway. Well, all things considered, 4maskwolf's pressure vote on me near the end of the day does seem rather scummy. Honestly, it's like he was trying to bring down a hammer on me at the end of the day without anyone else noticing, a hammer narrowly averted by NQT and an extension. It seems blasted obvious.
4maskwolf, plenty of reasoning has been brought against you. Reasoning I agree with wholeheartedly. (Of course, you may die anyway even without my vote, but if NQT's day kill is fake I still want you lynched for what you attempted to do to me. I don't suppose
you have a response?~~~
Right now a Tiruin lynch would be fine.
... what. A lynch on a near-lurker who hasn't been active enough to be read? There are better choices.
~~~
What do people think of 4mask's response to the daykill?
... I think he thinks you're bluffing on that. And honestly I think you're bluffing on the day kill also. (Posting in thread to activate? A PM seems like the more likely trigger. You could have posted in the thread as a courtesy to let us know you sent the PM, though. Still, let's see what happens.)
~~~
What do I think? I think I want answers. Why are you pulling this crap? Why did you randomly suggest to lynch Tiruin out of all the other candidates? Why do you think anybody is going to buy your weak-ass explanation as to why he didn't die? Why is the entire second part of your post WIFOM?
And yes, it's consistent with practically anybody but town. If you were town, you wouldn't have tried these pathetic experimental gambits. Who are they helping? They've been nothing but a point of contention all day, leading to Fallacy going off on epileptic-tree ramblings and Jack threatening anything from rolecop to nightkill. Tell me one reason I shouldn't lynch you.
And whether you'e being helpful or not has everything to do with your alignment, thank you very much. If you were being helpful, you wouldn't have pulled all this confusing crap from the get-go.
Ramblings... eh, true enough.
And really, the one reason you shouldn't lynch him is Jack's test- if Jack wasn't doing that I would be tearing NQT to shreds right now- NQT's still on thin ice.