What do people think of 4mask's response to the daykill?
A little emotional but overall level headed; I'm flattered by his opinion of me, I'm confused about what he said about you always lying (The absolute term would create a paradox, it would have made more sense to say
almost always lying), and he brings up a good point about Jack.
He's still alive at this moment, and ZU has posted another vote-count, so I can only assume if (most of) your claims are correct the daykill has either been processed or you forgot to send a PM when posting the activation term. 4mask's willingness to call your bluff until proven true is a little stubborn, but it's logical.
I'm more concerned with Tawarochir's reaction to your daykill, after this question. It's a chainsaw defense clouded by emotion.
Your own responses to these responses do trigger a couple red flags, bringing up new claims and referring to old ones. But since you don't believe Taw and 4mask are on a team together, I'm going to have to discard the chainsaw defense theory now.
(( 0) The focus on NQT))
1) Threatening people to do your bidding and agree with you.
2) Instead of coming up with ideas on your own you appeal to authority.
3) Not having any suspects (once you stopped focusing on NQT), viewing everyone as town. Being wishy-washy about hunting anyone else.
Even though you're "dropping your case" against me, I'm going to go ahead and and answer these concerns.
1. Threatening you say? My words were-something like this: "if you want NQT to not be lynched you had better give good reasoning or you will be suspicious to me". I think. So let's give an example. Urist McMafioso says "no, I don't want to lynch NQT because he's obviously town". Would that not earn your suspicion? If someone gives a reason, say: "no, I don't want to lynch NQT because his WIFOM bomb sparked a lot of conversation", that's justifiable.
2. Appeal to authority. Game two, man. I don't have enough experience to generate dense, filled-out cases on my own- though I have to say I'm trying, and learning. Besides, examining what others say provides me with good clues/thoughts/words to build my own arsenal for when I go on the attack.
3. No suspects. No obvious ones, anyway. Well, all things considered, 4maskwolf's pressure vote on me near the end of the day does seem rather scummy. Honestly, it's like he was trying to bring down a hammer on me at the end of the day without anyone else noticing, a hammer narrowly averted by NQT and an extension. It seems blasted obvious. 4maskwolf, plenty of reasoning has been brought against you. Reasoning I agree with wholeheartedly. (Of course, you may die anyway even without my vote, but if NQT's day kill is fake I still want you lynched for what you attempted to do to me. I don't suppose you have a response?
OK, this is reasonable enough for me.