why the hell does a goldfish woman has boobs ? and why the furry pictures ? ugh
They happened to be on my mind and in my feed, blame the polygamy thread. But if a DF animal-person has been given thumbs, vocal cords and upright posture, why stop there? And it's about paintings anyways. Why wouldn't a dwarf painter paint boobs on things that shouldn't have boobs?
Opposable thumbs or a good grasping part (elephant trunks) are pretty much necessary for any kind of advanced civilization. Tool use and all that. If they don't have grasping parts, then they should just be sentient animals- culture, philosophy, education, yes, but technology ? Nope.
Hell, without grasping parts you don't even get to Paleolithic tech level.
Vocal cords are also a great component of a civilization, sure you can have mute civilizations but language makes it more familiar and easier to interact with.
Upright posture is the next logical step after opposable thumbs. I mean you can be a chimpanzee and have partial bipedy but having a pair of specialized feet and developing a pair of hands frees the hands from movement.
Boobs on a fish, however... what ? I'm fine with them on centaurs and mermaids and stuff that are essentially one part human and another part animal, but ?
(Yeah, I know, fanservice and artistic licence and so on. Still... wat)